In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/02/2007
at 02:55 PM, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If a vendor keeps his products up-to-date with the latest OS, and has
>logic to ensure he doesn't try to run features that aren't available
>in an earlier OS, I think customers should be able to install th
CTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: How many sites still on V1.5 or earlier?
Guys and Gals,
You are making it all more complicated than the question. Eric B. came
closest to answering the question and even he didn't because his a
From: Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Again, you are over simplifying and probably thinking about how you
handle this for your ISPF product, which could really be considered more of
an
"application" than "system software".
You're probably right. I do tend to 'simplify' everything. It's in my
We are v1.4, however the system will be shutdown in the July timeframe.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blaicher, Chris
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How many sites still on V1.5 or
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:55:39 +, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From: Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>I admit I don't like ISV products that
>>seem to require a version upgrade with every OS upgrade
>
>If a vendor keeps his products up-to-date with the latest OS, and has logic
>to ensu
From: Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I admit I don't like ISV products that
seem to require a version upgrade with every OS upgrade
If a vendor keeps his products up-to-date with the latest OS, and has logic
to ensure he doesn't try to run features that aren't available in an earlier
OS, I th
We are still running z/OS 1.5 on an IBM 7060 H30.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Blaicher, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How many sites still on V1.5 or earlier?
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:01:19 -0500
Guys and Gals,
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:01 -0500, Blaicher, Chris wrote:
> Simple question: Are you still running V1.5 now that it is EOS?
Yep. Up until January we had a 7060 and couldn't install anything past
1.5. Now that we have one of those Baby Computers we're planning the
1.8 upgrade.
--
David Andrews
Guys and Gals,
You are making it all more complicated than the question. Eric B. came
closest to answering the question and even he didn't because his answer
was about a place he used to work at.
Simple question: Are you still running V1.5 now that it is EOS?
And for Chris Craddock, this is a p
In a recent note, Mark Zelden said:
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:47:29 -0500
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:37:42 +, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The nice thing about having a single product version for all versions of th
> e
> >operating system is that as customers upgrade the
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:37:42 +, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The nice thing about having a single product version for all versions of the
>operating system is that as customers upgrade their older systems, new
>features become available 'automatically' without the customer having to
--
V1.4 and V1.5 go out of service tonight and I was just wondering how
many shops are going to be SOL because the system they are running have
hit EOS?
I don't think the situation is quite as dire as you s
From: "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris (Blaicher) is looking at the question from the ISV point of view.
While all of the comments made on both sides of the question are
correct, what is not said - at least not here - is that very often we
see customers who are very back-level on OS and
In a recent note, Craddock, Chris said:
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 12:40:45 -0400
>
> correct, what is not said - at least not here - is that very often we
> see customers who are very back-level on OS and middleware maintenance
> and who still want to get the latest and greatest functionali
> <> I did not interpret it to mean SOL for migration paths.
> Only SOL and out of support. But both comments are still valid.
> Unless you have a definite migration path to go to, you can run
> unsupported. Of if there is suddenly a pressing business need to
> go to a more current version of the
Chris,
I now better understand the scope of your question. I did not interpret it
to mean SOL for migration paths. Only SOL and out of support.
But both comments are still valid. Unless you have a definite migration
path to go to, you can run unsupported. Of if there is suddenly a pressing
bu
agree not to rely on this information or take any action against BMC
Software in response to this information.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I echo Eric's comments. Out of service just means you cannot open requests
for fixes that have not been already fixed. Any fix that has been
identified - IBM can help you find. However, if it is a new issue, then you
either pay big bucks for the fix or upgrade or "just don't do that".
IBM still
elefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
414-475-7434
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:10:58 -0500
> From: "Blaicher, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: How many sites still on V1.5 or earlier?
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>
> V
V1.4 and V1.5 go out of service tonight and I was just wondering how
many shops are going to be SOL because the system they are running have
hit EOS?
Christopher Y. Blaicher
BMC Software, Inc.
Austin Development Labs
(512) 340-6154
The comments made are my personal opinions. BMC Software, Inc. mak
20 matches
Mail list logo
