In , on 03/19/2010
at 12:10 PM, Howard Brazee said:
>Since Apple and IBM *are* their hardware vendors, they essentially do the
>same thing.
No. There is a thriving market in 3rd party mainframe software, IBM
markets software on hardware that it doesn't make and IBM releases
interface informat
On 19 Mar 2010 10:57:29 -0700, shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
>>How does Microsoft limit its hardware vendors that
>>is more limiting than what IBM (or Apple) does?
>
>Micro$oft imposes contract that essentially require charging customers for
>m$ software on every b
In , on
03/15/2010
at 02:38 PM, "McKown, John" said:
>What competitive boxen?
Any PC running Hercules, for starters.
>Hercules/390 never was designed to really be a competitor.
Yet it still is.
>That PSI / Itanium thingie?
That too.
>It does appear, to me, that IBM wants to tightly contr
In , on 03/16/2010
at 09:23 AM, Howard Brazee said:
>How does Microsoft limit its hardware vendors that
>is more limiting than what IBM (or Apple) does?
Micro$oft imposes contract that essentially require charging customers for
m$ software on every box shipped. They also sign contracts with h
On 15 Mar 2010 12:19:23 -0700, shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel
Metz , Seymour J.) wrote:
>>IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>>http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
>
>Does this mean that microsoft h
ua.edu
>> Subject: Re: IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>>
>> In , on 03/15/2010
>> at 10:48 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>>
>> >IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>> >http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:19 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>
> In
In , on 03/15/2010
at 10:48 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
Does this mean that microsoft has stopped signing restrictive contracts
wit
heeler
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:49 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to
> bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
from above
10 matches
Mail list logo
