Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:54:09 -0500 Thomas Conley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :- Original Message - :From: Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] :Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main :Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:12 PM :Subject: Re: ISPCMDS : On Feb 9, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Dave Salt wrote: : From

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-10 Thread Robert Lawrence
Salt Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: ISPCMDS From: Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And also, to *not* becoming an obstacle preventing people from using new features. I know of a shop that until recently was using an ISPCMDS table that was 10 years out

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/09/2006 at 07:12 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I guess we have to agree to disagree. Some shops want vanilla A customized command table is *NOT* vanilla! -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

ISPCMDS

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Salt
From: Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And also, to *not* becoming an obstacle preventing people from using new features. I know of a shop that until recently was using an ISPCMDS table that was 10 years out of date. Many 'new' commands like DDLIST, DTEST, CMDE, AUTOTYPE and NRETRIEV etc were

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-09 Thread Ed Gould
On Feb 9, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Dave Salt wrote: From: Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And also, to *not* becoming an obstacle preventing people from using new features. I know of a shop that until recently was using an ISPCMDS table that was 10 years out of date. Many 'new' commands like

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-09 Thread Dave Salt
From: Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess we have to agree to disagree. Some shops want vanilla and and no add ons. SUPPORT Costs (and ) Time. Ed, Whether a shop wants vanilla or not, they shouldn't customize ISPCMDS. So what is it we're agreeing to disagree about? Dave Salt

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-09 Thread Thomas Conley
- Original Message - From: Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 8:12 PM Subject: Re: ISPCMDS On Feb 9, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Dave Salt wrote: From: Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] And also, to *not* becoming an obstacle preventing

Re: ISPCMDS

2006-02-09 Thread Ed Gould
On Feb 9, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Dave Salt wrote: From: Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess we have to agree to disagree. Some shops want vanilla and and no add ons. SUPPORT Costs (and ) Time. Ed, Whether a shop wants vanilla or not, they shouldn't customize ISPCMDS. So what