Re: Interesting, to me, observation.

2008-02-25 Thread Matthew Stitt
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:30:28 -0600, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:23 PM >> To: IBM-MAIN@BAM

Re: Interesting, to me, observation.

2008-02-25 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:23 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Interesting, to me, observation. > > > When you reverse t

Re: Interesting, to me, observation.

2008-02-25 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
d, you are creating a real entry in a catalog with instructions to ignore normal alias processing, including potential name conflicts. Both seem pathological. -Original Message- From: McKown, John Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Interest

Interesting, to me, observation.

2008-02-25 Thread McKown, John
If I run a job with the following two IDCAMS commands, the second command, DEF ALIAS, fails with IDC3013I DUPLICATE DATA SET NAME IMPORT CONNECT - OBJECTS (( - TSSTV.ICF.VBV0001 - VOL(BV1075) DEVT(3390) - )) CAT(CATALOG.ICF.VI24CAT.MCAT) DEF ALIAS(NAME(TSSTV) RELATE(CATALOG.