2009/2/22 Patrick O'Keefe patrick.oke...@wamu.net:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:14:14 -0700, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
...
I don't know how successful they'll be, but I wish them well.
...
I take it, then, that you are an exponent of Mantissa.
Sorry. I couldn't resist.
Characteristic
Subject: Re: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
Comes up fine in IE 7 on my PC.
Tom Kelman
Enterprise Capacity Planner
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
IBM won't let you run their products on x86 platform.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009
Check your local 'IBM Linux on System z Executive Advisory Customer
Council'.
The NY meeting on March 13 is going to have a discussion on Mantissa, I
assume the others will too at some point.
-Original Message-
Ward, Mike S
This is fantastic, I wish I could go. Does anyone have any
We'll all find out next Friday at Gary's presentation. Patience, grasshopper.
Ward, Mike S wrote:
This is fantastic, I wish I could go. Does anyone have any additional
information on running windows under z/VM?
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:14:14 -0700, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
...
I don't know how successful they'll be, but I wish them well.
...
I take it, then, that you are an exponent of Mantissa.
Sorry. I couldn't resist.
Pat O'Keefe
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
IBM Japan, Ltd.
e99...@jp.ibm.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the HTML on that page. And all
the others that I looked at as well. It just
Displays OK in Firefox ..
Regards
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: 20 February 2009 15:57
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00
It comes up perfectly here.
John McKown wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the HTML on that page. And
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:56:42 -0600, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:42 AM
Subject: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Here's
The big question is how the licensing of MS Windows will work on z -
assuming it is even possible.
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: lionel.b.d...@kp.org
AIM: lbdyck |
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:56:42 -0600, John McKown joa...@swbell.net
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples
e99...@jp.ibm.com
wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
If you plan to attend the session, that will be a question for Gary.
Lionel B Dyck wrote:
The big question is how the licensing of MS Windows will work on z -
assuming it is even possible.
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
02/20/2009 08:25 AM
Subject:
Re: Mantissa Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
If you plan to attend the session, that will be a question for Gary.
Lionel B Dyck wrote:
The big question is how the licensing
Presenting at SHARE (March 6, 2009)?
If you plan to attend the session, that will be a question for Gary.
Lionel B Dyck wrote:
The big question is how the licensing of MS Windows will work on z -
assuming it is even possible.
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:11:43 -0500, Pinnacle wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Here's to hoping that Microsoft sues Mantissa claiming patent infringement
and then IBM and Mantissa countersue citing Microsoft's monopoly position
(pot, meet
2009/2/20 Kelman, Tom thomas.kel...@commercebank.com:
If a company has a license for Windows itself can Microsoft restrict what
hardware it is run on?
Well, IANAL etc, but there do seem to be two major MS WIndows licence
types. The Retail licence doesn't say anything about what it runs on,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:04:07 -0600, John McKown wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:56:42 -0600, John McKown wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the HTML on
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:39:14 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the HTML on that page. And all
the others that I looked at as well. It just ends without all the markup.
Hum. Page renders just fine in Firefox on
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:28:39 -0500, Tony Harminc tz...@attglobal.net wrote:
snip
It also seems inplausible that running Windows desktop on a z box is
going to make sense. Surely it will be Windows server flavours that
have the potential go move to big iron. And Windows servers are much
easier to
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:58:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
snip
There's little pride of craftsmanship left nowadays.
Management doesn't care and won't pay for it. If it works 80% of the time
and does 80% of what is required, and only costs half of what 100% would
cost, then
On 2/20/2009 at 12:28 PM, Tony Harminc tz...@attglobal.net wrote:
-snip-
It also seems inplausible that running Windows desktop on a z box is
going to make sense.
If you look at the right side of the web page, you can see some indications of
where they think it might be useful.
I don't know
24 matches
Mail list logo
