Re: Max dynamic allocate in single step

2005-05-11 Thread David Speake
Actually, a two byte field would only allow for +9 Gens. See my previous post. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archi

Re: Max dynamic allocate in single step

2005-05-11 Thread Johnston, Robert E
Good morning (in some places)... For the record, the software vendor found a place where they were using a 2 byte field which caused the problem when creating more than 99 generations. Don't have a lot if detail about it but they are working on a fix. Thanks again for your help! Robert

Re: Max dynamic allocate in single step

2005-05-11 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/10/2005 at 10:18 AM, "Johnston, Robert E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >This is proprietary software that is supported by consultants, so we >have no source code to look at. Of course, they think it is an OS >problem (we are z/OS 1.4), and we think it is an app proble