>My intention in the original post was to assist George in his Bronzeplex
project. If you have something to say on that subject, you should do so.
...
The problem is:
You have a REPLYTO that is NOT IBM-Main.
So, we are responding, expecting it to go to the list.
It does not go to the list!
Then
rv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Merging SYSPLEXes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lance Kopplin
- Original Message -
From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I don't like this one.
Oh dear
>You didn't post a message, you sent an email to my ID.
Only if you over-rode the default REPLYTO.
It was an IBM-Main Post that I replied to.
And, this one would have gone to you, directly, if I hadn't caught it.
Please, fix your REPLYTO.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edw
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lance Kopplin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I don't like this one.
>
> Oh dear
>
> > Why should I request permission from another poster to post messages?
>
> You d
- Original Message -
From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 6:00 PM
Subject: Fw: Re: Merging SYSPLEXes
I don't like this one.
Oh dear
Why should I request permission from another poster to
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
>I have worked with Parallel SYSPLEX for 11 years; GDPS for 5.
>I have never heard the term 'Bronzeplex'.
>What is it; where is it doc'd?
>
Ted,
As one of the authors of the Redbook 'Merging Systems into a Sysplex"
Lance, Yes, I am very interested in your advise on IGSNQXIT. My email
address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Most of the systems will be zOS 1.6
and so I would also be interested in the GRS APAR.
Regards, George
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Gil, This is the first stage in merging the 2 SYSPEXes. We would then
look to merging some control datasets, e.g. tape. In this step we just
want to achieve a single (Bronze) SYSPLEX for the price benefit.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscrib
Thanks for your reply. I assume you are using the supplied ISGNQXIT to
allow reserves for volumes shared outside the SYSPLEX. We actually plan to
share all DASD but the systems of the original 2 SYSPLEXes would continue
to use their original datasets. As far as couple datasets, that would be
the on
I don't like this one.
Why should I request permission from another poster to post messages?
If you want to subscribe to the list don't send out this garbage!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:21:47
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: R
This was intended for the list.
-Original Message-
From: "Ted MacNEIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:20:36
To:"Lance Kopplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Merging SYSPLEXes
>We have implemented a Bronzeplex
...
I have worked with
riginal Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:25 PM
Subject: Merging SYSPLEXes
We are looking at merging 2 SYSPLEXes which are 20 KMs apart. Our first
step is to create a Bronze-PLEX as described in SG26-6818 Merging
S
George,
In my opinion, you should espire to share as much as possible.
Whenever using different data sets for each group of LPARs is a must, I
would use a new qualifier in the data set name to differenciate the 2 groups
(from the 2 previously seperate SYSPLEXes).
Even though you will be using dif
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:25:35 -0700, George Kozakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We are looking at merging 2 SYSPLEXes which are 20 KMs apart. Our first
>step is to create a Bronze-PLEX as described in SG26-6818 Merging
>Systems into a SYSPLEX. The driver is to achieve single SYSPLEX
>pricing.
>We a
We are looking at merging 2 SYSPLEXes which are 20 KMs apart. Our first
step is to create a Bronze-PLEX as described in SG26-6818 Merging
Systems into a SYSPLEX. The driver is to achieve single SYSPLEX
pricing. We want to create on SYSPLEX where all systems would share the
same ISGLOCK structure an
15 matches
Mail list logo
