Howard Brazee wrote:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/26/0652216/Microsoft-Backed-Firm-Sa
ys-IBM-Is-Anticompetitive
Wonder what they'd do if they had some competition on their own size
platform. File suit???
Strikes me as another example of (whine, whine, piss and moan) because
you're
I read more of the article. Another part of the anti-competitive stance is that
only IBM does, or can, produce a 64-bit z series machine for customer use
(FlexES 64-bit was only for developers?). One of the plaintiff was/is T3, who
was with HP in the area of running IBM z/OS, and other z softwar
mess kits.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 6:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Microsoft claims mainframes anti-competitive
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 7:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Microsoft claims mainframes anti-competitive
>
> http://tech.sla
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/26/0652216/Microsoft-Backed-Firm-Sa
ys-IBM-Is-Anticompetitive
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET
5 matches
Mail list logo
