On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:18:03 -0400, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Given that the mainframe was running 2.10, I suspect that the
>applications running on it were ones that were less than optimal and
>this may have forced application consolidation and upgrade. Frankly I
>would like to
chke, David G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:09 PM
>Subject: Migrating Off IBM Mainframes - Part 2
>
>
>> Greetings again,
>> Another link on that page pointed to a company that already made
Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:09 PM
Subject: Migrating Off IBM Mainframes - Part 2
Greetings again,
Another link on that page pointed to a company that already made this
migration. This story is from March 2005. Has anybody heard how well it
worked for them and how well it's working now ???
Greetings again,
Another link on that page pointed to a company that already made this
migration. This story is from March 2005. Has anybody heard how well it
worked for them and how well it's working now ???
"Ancor IT director Kelly Colohan had a decision to make. Informed by IBM
that it wou
4 matches
Mail list logo