Roland:
It's right!!!.
The module version in LPA was 2.2. We have done IPL with the new module in
LPA (ver 3.2) and now works.
Thanks a lot
Jorge
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:52:37 -0600, Jorge Garcia wrote:
>I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
>define a new xcf group because, when we start the new address spaces in
>the new version with the new xcf group, the new group appears in sysplex.
>That's righ
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:08:51 -0600, Mark Zelden
wrote:
>>
>>We use the command:
>>setxcf modify,classdef,class=default,addgroup=(DFHIR000,DFHIR032)
>>
>>We can't use the command setxcf start because the default class exists yet.
>>The modify is right but when we start the new address spaces conn
Ensure the latest level of DFHIRP is in the LPA. Easy way is to invoke
TSO ISRDDN command LOAD DFHIRP, enter and scroll back. 650 means CTS
3.2
*DFH
IRP ih÷.0650I.â
..UK30311 ..CICS
Roland
>I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
>define a
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:40:17 -0600, Jorge Garcia wrote:
>Hello:
>
> We are installing a new CICS version (3.2) and we need to add a new XCF
>group for the address spaces of this new version. The address spaces of
>actual version (2.2) are working with DFHIR000 but now we want to add a
>new xcf gr
I've received a call from a colleague and he saids me that it's no necessary to
define a new xcf group because, when we start the new address spaces in
the new version with the new xcf group, the new group appears in sysplex.
That's right, but now, when we start the new address spaces appears th
Hello:
We are installing a new CICS version (3.2) and we need to add a new XCF
group for the address spaces of this new version. The address spaces of
actual version (2.2) are working with DFHIR000 but now we want to add a
new xcf group and connect the address spaces of the new version to the
7 matches
Mail list logo
