Re: New Tape units

2006-01-04 Thread Porowski, Ken
See imbedded comments ... -Original Message- Hal Merritt We are being told that the library system is 100% SMS controlled. We have had robots in the past, but had never heard this as a requirement. It this your experience? The ATL and 'tapes' are SMS managed the datasets on the

Re: New Tape units

2006-01-04 Thread R.S.
Porowski, Ken wrote: See imbedded comments ... -Original Message- Hal Merritt [...] You will probably want to look at OAM exits CBRUXENT and CBRUXVNL at a minimum. RMM may supply samples. RMM probably has a process for autoeject of tapes going offsite (probably an optional piece

Re: New Tape units

2006-01-04 Thread Porowski, Ken
with the 3490-F1A's but most of that was due to our dirty/old tapes. Ken Porowski -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] New Tape units Porowski

New Tape units

2006-01-03 Thread Hal Merritt
Our year end 'sweet deal' from IBM was a tape 'robot'. The IBM 3494 system. We don't do near enough tape processing to justify the VTS. Two robots, actually, one for our production site and one for the BR site. This system is to replace our two antique 3490 ACL units and two aged 3590 ACL