I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND
find trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the whole world!
Thus, the risk of ma
David Cole wrote:
I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND find
trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the whole world!
O
R.S. wrote:
David Cole wrote:
I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND
find trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the who
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:40 +0900, Clement Clarke wrote:
>
>You must agree that you will abide by the GNU terms, and not use it
>commercially without some appreciation, or for war.
What does that mean?
--
Tom Marchant
--
For I
>One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
>This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND
>find trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the whole world!
It really is a double-edged blade... Anyone can read it and find trap doors;
true. But th
5 matches
Mail list logo
