Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Clem Clarke
Greetings. I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and wonder where the best place might be to do this. And, of course, any changes to the code need to be made available for all. I have the following: 1. An entire interpretive language that can be used as a shell

Re: Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Stephen Y Odo
seems like the CBT tape would be a good home for this. see http://www.cbttape.org/ -- Stephen Clem Clarke wrote: Greetings. I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and wonder where the best place might be to do this. And, of course, any changes to the code need

Re: Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Paul Gillis
Clem Clarke wrote: Greetings. I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and wonder where the best place might be to do this. Hi Clem, Either Sam Knutson or Sam Golob at www.cbttape.org would be more than happy to provide a place for your code. Does this now mean

Re: Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Paul Gillis
Paul Gillis wrote: Clem Clarke wrote: Greetings. I want to share some PL/I and Assembler code through Open Source, and wonder where the best place might be to do this. Hi Clem, Either Sam Knutson or Sam Golob at www.cbttape.org would be more than happy to provide a place for your code.

Re: Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Shane
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:42 +1000, Paul Gillis wrote: Took a few breaths and re-read your email. I would recommend it all went onto the cbttape, and if an open source license is required, why not use the GNU General Public License available at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt That

Re: Open Sourcing ASM, PL/I and C Code

2006-04-25 Thread Paul Gillis
Shane wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:42 +1000, Paul Gillis wrote: Took a few breaths and re-read your email. I would recommend it all went onto the cbttape, and if an open source license is required, why not use the GNU General Public License available at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt