For WTO TEXT=
If "yore" is before SP4.1.0 (approx 1987) then "no", TEXT= was not
available then.
i.e., TEXT= was added in SP4.1.0.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 11/22/2010 1:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Have you tried using the TEXT= keyword?
That should have worked. Was it available in days of yore?
Depends on your definition of "yore". I don't remember it from (for example) MVS
3.8 or whe
I have developed a genuine liking for these tennis match posts regarding
topics I don't remotely understand. The use of the King's English has
become the entertainment aspect that I find particularly challenging and
amusing. I keep having to google words with which I will then amaze my
circle
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:39:58 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Can you do a CL64'initial text' for the definition and have the
>execute definition overlay the initial text as needed?
>
IIRC, the problem arose because the ROUTCDE and DESC must follow
snugly the message of unknown length. Yes, I could fak
Can you do a CL64'initial text' for the definition and have the
execute definition overlay the initial text as needed?
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 9:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>
>> No, no, no! I was referring not to the syntax of the macro instruction
On 11/22/2010 9:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
No, no, no! I was referring not to the syntax of the macro instruction,
but to the generated argument list to the SVC, which places options after
the variable-length text string, requiring convolutions to supply a
text string of unpredictable length i
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:44:00 +, john gilmore wrote:
>
>
>I haven't coded a WTO lately. IIRC (much of) the cruft mentioned arises from
>the unforgivable misdesign of placing options after a variable-length text
>argument. It would have been so easy to do it right.
>
>
>If this means what it ap
Paul Gilmartin writes:
I haven't coded a WTO lately. IIRC (much of) the cruft mentioned arises from
the unforgivable misdesign of placing options after a variable-length text
argument. It would have been so easy to do it right.
If this means what it appears to mean it reflects 'radical' ign
8 matches
Mail list logo
