> new ??? new fix ? apar ?
>
> Scott J Ford
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Elliot, David"
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 1:40:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Question on WTO macro - Programming requirements
>
> Wasn't R0
In , on
09/16/2010
at 12:40 PM, "Elliot, David" said:
>Wasn't R0 used (at one time) for the message id to link multiline
>WTOs together?
R0 was used for several things. I suspect that some of them are still
in WTO. Keep in mind that some WTO functions require authorization and
that the interp
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Elliot, David
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:40 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Question on WTO macro - Programming requirements
>
> Was
On 16 September 2010 13:40, Elliot, David wrote:
>
> Wasn't R0 used (at one time) for the message id to link multiline WTOs
> together?
There was a now obsolete MCSFLAG=REG0 option that set a flag in the
argument list saying to use the content of R0 for message direction
purposes. I can't imagin
September 16, 2010 1:40:30 PM
Subject: Re: Question on WTO macro - Programming requirements
Wasn't R0 used (at one time) for the message id to link multiline WTOs together?
David Elliot
zSeries Software Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@
: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Question on WTO macro - Programming requirements
In: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A990/88.1.2
it states: "You should clear register 0". But it doesn't say why. Nor does it
indicate whether it means the 32 bit portion o
In: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A990/88.1.2
it states: "You should clear register 0". But it doesn't say why. Nor does it
indicate whether it means the 32 bit portion or the 64 bit portion. I guess it
doesn't really matter since GPR0 is "volatile", but I am cur
7 matches
Mail list logo
