On Wed, 12 May 2010 19:19:12 -0500, Lenz, Joseph joseph.l...@ttiinc.com wrote:
Is there a way to keep RACF from preventing signons to my z/OS 1.10
system when RACF message ICH304D has been issued? I would prefer the
system just revoke the user without the need for operator intervention.
A user
On Thu, May 13th, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
You could automate a response to that message. However, this gives
you only two possibilities:
(1) Risk all your SPECIAL IDs becoming revoked if your automation
responds that RACF should not grant another chance; or
(2) Allow unlimited
List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: RACF - ICH3031 ICH304D Messages
On Wed, 12 May 2010 19:19:12 -0500, Lenz, Joseph joseph.l...@ttiinc.com
wrote:
Is there a way to keep RACF from preventing
Is there a way to keep RACF from preventing signons to my z/OS 1.10
system when RACF message ICH304D has been issued? I would prefer the
system just revoke the user without the need for operator intervention.
A user who is not 'SPECIAL' simply gets revoked. Users who are
'SPECIAL' cause the
I would think that could be handled better by either mpf list or automation
(Netview, OPS/MVS, AF Oper).
Lizette
Lenz, Joseph Wrote:
Is there a way to keep RACF from preventing signons to my z/OS 1.10
system when RACF message ICH304D has been issued? I would prefer the
system just revoke
5 matches
Mail list logo
