ssage-
Date:Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:36:10 -0600
From:Penny Kay
Subject: Re: RACF Protection for Initiiators - JES2
Historically at our site we checked the jobcard in Exit 2 which had
time specifications in the accounting field and then added time and class
according to those specifica
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:36:10 -0600, Penny Kay wrote:
>Historically at our site we checked the jobcard in Exit 2 which had
>time specifications in the accounting field and then added time and class
>according to those specifications.
>Finally, we are moving from z/os 1.6 to 1.8 and have to eit
On 18 Jan 2010 01:36:51 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Historically at our site we checked the jobcard in Exit 2 which had
>time specifications in the accounting field and then added time and class
>according to those specifications.
>Finally, we are moving from z/os 1.6 to 1.8 a
There is an old IBM manual that has a sample exit to do exactly this. I
don't have the reference handy, but check the IBM-MAIN archives.
It checks the JOBCLASS userID against a dummy RACF facility class. I'm
sure it can be modified as needed.
HTH,
Subject: Re: RACF Protection for I
Historically at our site we checked the jobcard in Exit 2 which had
time specifications in the accounting field and then added time and class
according to those specifications.
Finally, we are moving from z/os 1.6 to 1.8 and have to either recode
exit 2 to include and add exit 52 or better yet
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:28:37 -0600, Jimmy Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm looking for the samples to setup RACF protection on initiators. It's been a
>while since last implementation. I thought there was something on the CBT
>tape. Searches of the CBT and archieves have not been kind to me.
I'm looking for the samples to setup RACF protection on initiators. It's been a
while since last implementation. I thought there was something on the CBT
tape. Searches of the CBT and archieves have not been kind to me. Thanks in
advance for all help.
Jimmy
-
7 matches
Mail list logo
