Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth > > Well, I found it! Had it all along. Just needed to allocate my rexx lib. > Weird thing, tho, is that mine is exactly like yours BUT it has an IBM > copyright: > > > /* Sample Edit Macro ***

Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:49:35 -0400, Klein, Kenneth wrote: > >lines. I usually 'del all x" and then cancel the edit session. Scary. > Starting with "View" rather than "Edit" makes it somewhat less scary. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN sub

Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Howard Brazee
On 25 Jun 2009 06:14:31 -0700, erik.jans...@ing.nl (Erik Janssen) wrote: >>Now if it could only eliminate the >> >>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Line(s) not Sometimes I cut and paste that in, when I want to print a copy of SDSF output that I want to exclude most output

Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Klein, Kenneth
rsday, June 25, 2009 9:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available >Now if it could only eliminate the > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Line(s) not >Displayed > >lines. I usually 'del all x&qu

Re: REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Erik Janssen
>Now if it could only eliminate the > >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 Line(s) not >Displayed > >lines. I usually 'del all x" and then cancel the edit session. Scary. Isn't 'hide excluded' what you are looking for here? Hiding the excluded lines without deleting them. R

REXX exec: 'only' - was = RE: JCT Not Available

2009-06-25 Thread Klein, Kenneth
Well, I found it! Had it all along. Just needed to allocate my rexx lib. Weird thing, tho, is that mine is exactly like yours BUT it has an IBM copyright: /* Sample Edit Macro */ /*