Re: Question on LU6.2 trace - Request Header flags

2005-07-19 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/18/2005 at 10:19 AM, Mauri Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If the bit is ON there seems to be 2 possibilities ... An FM header or an NS RU. Is there a way to know which one of the cases we are talking about ? You need to look at the RU type separately. Also, you

Re: Question on LU6.2 trace - Request Header flags

2005-07-18 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Hanrahan There used to be manuals that detailed the TH, RH and RU in gruesome detail. SNA Formats was one; the other I knew about was SNA Network Products Formats which was a licensed publication last time I

Re: Question on LU6.2 trace - Request Header flags

2005-07-18 Thread Mauri Kanter
Paul/John Thank you for your prompt answer. I do have SNA formats. I will try to search for the other books. For the time being I will compare the 2 bytes of ru+1 for x'0502', and if yes, I will check if it is x'0502FF', to be sure that it is the attach request ... I hope I will not find in the

Re: Question on LU6.2 trace - Request Header flags

2005-07-18 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mauri Kanter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Hanrahan There used to be manuals that detailed the TH, RH and RU in gruesome detail. SNA Formats was one; the

Re: Question on LU6.2 trace - Request Header flags

2005-07-18 Thread Mauri Kanter
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:05:36 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Hanrahan There used to be manuals that detailed the TH, RH and RU in gruesome detail. SNA Formats was one; the other I knew about was SNA