In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/14/2008
at 09:54 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think the doc isn't really correct there.It is a convention to make
the LLQ match the DDDEF.
Then how does it process BINDER/Link data in the JCLIN?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/14/2008
at 09:54 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think the doc isn't really correct there.It is a convention to make
the LLQ match the DDDEF.
Then how does it process BINDER/Link data in the JCLIN?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:33:58 -0500, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:49:16 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
JCLIN LLQ must equal the DDDEF name. There is no requirement that a DDDEF
of LINKLIB point to hlq.LINKLIB. It can point to SCHMUEL.METZ and SMP/E
will happily go
3 matches
Mail list logo