Re: SMP/E names (was: Consistent Data Set Names)

2008-04-15 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/14/2008 at 09:54 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think the doc isn't really correct there.It is a convention to make the LLQ match the DDDEF. Then how does it process BINDER/Link data in the JCLIN? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and

Re: SMP/E names (was: Consistent Data Set Names)

2008-04-15 Thread Edward Jaffe
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/14/2008 at 09:54 AM, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think the doc isn't really correct there.It is a convention to make the LLQ match the DDDEF. Then how does it process BINDER/Link data in the JCLIN?

Re: SMP/E names (was: Consistent Data Set Names)

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:33:58 -0500, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:49:16 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: JCLIN LLQ must equal the DDDEF name. There is no requirement that a DDDEF of LINKLIB point to hlq.LINKLIB. It can point to SCHMUEL.METZ and SMP/E will happily go