Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Charles Mills
rame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question Thanks. > Could there be something wrong with how your Unicode Services tables > are configured?

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Charles Mills
ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question Thanks. > Could there be something wrong with how your Unicode Services tables are configured? Sure, but I try to avoid "blame the compil

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Charles Mills
les -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question Charles, I'm not sure what the problem is, but 1252 is a single

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Kirk Wolf
("XLATE", "(%05d %05d '%s')", XlateFrom, XlateTo, > XlateTechniques); > > (it's in the Parms class so the Parms:: is implicit) > > and the output is > > XLATE (01047 01252 'LMER') > > Charles > -Original Message---

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Charles Mills
e Parms class so the Parms:: is implicit) and the output is XLATE (01047 01252 'LMER') Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Walt Farrell Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sub

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Walt Farrell
Does it work as you expected for other characters in 1047 whose equivalent in 1252 have values above x"7F"? Or is the not sign the only one that's mis-behaving? -- Walt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Charles Mills
scussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question Charles, x'C2AC' is the logical not symbol in UTF-8. Are you sure that you are translating to 1252? When

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:40 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Unicode Services translation question > > (John M. was l

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:43:53 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >I don't understand what I am seeing from Unicode Services translation. > >I specify translation from 1047 (Encoding scheme 1100 - EBCDIC, SBCS; Name >LATIN 1 / OPEN SYSTEM) to 1252 (Encoding scheme 4105 - ASCII, SBCS; Name >MS-WIN LATIN-1).

Re: Unicode Services translation question

2012-05-23 Thread Kirk Wolf
Charles, x'C2AC' is the logical not symbol in UTF-8. Are you sure that you are translating to 1252? When I display the translate table for 1047->1252 using Unicode Services, it appears to be single bye -> single byte: Here is a dump using the "showtrtab" command (part of the free Co:Z Toolkit)