Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 3/19/2012 8:45 AM, Micheal Butz wrote: I am having problems with following coding generating a re-entrable version of the WTOR below is the relvant code WTOR TEXT=(D_MSG,REPLYAREA,REPLY_LEN,REPLY_ECB),MF=(E,WTO_D_L When you are dealing with old macros, use a PRINT ON,GEN arou

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Ray Overby
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf :>Of Rob Scott :>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:17 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :>Subject: Re: WTOR problem :> :>I do not think so. :> :>There could well be parameter list contents that are not set during MF=

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Bill Fairchild
on List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WTOR problem I do not think so. There could well be parameter list contents that are not set during MF=E logic that are primed by MF=L. Just because you specify al

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Binyamin Dissen
:>Followed by :> :> WTOR TEXT=D_MSG,MF=(E,WTO_D_LST) :> :>-Original Message- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf :>Of Rob Scott :>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:17 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Micheal Butz
Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WTOR problem I do not think so. There could well be parameter list contents that are not set during MF=E logic that are primed by MF=L. Just because you specify all possible parameters does not mean

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Micheal Butz
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WTOR problem I do not think so. There could well be parameter list contents that are not set during MF=E

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Scott :>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:52 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :>Subject: Re: WTOR problem :> :>WTOR and WTO are macros that require a model parameter list to be :>constructed and populated *before* you issue the MF=E form. :> :>Zeroing the parameter list is NOT s

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Rob Scott
ftware.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Micheal Butz Sent: 19 March 2012 14:07 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WTOR problem Rob, I understand that however moving the model *statement* would be sufficient if I coded

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Micheal Butz
populate the parameter list -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: WTOR problem WTOR and WTO are macros that require a model parameter list to be

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Ray Overby
Here is some code from a working program I have to issue a rent WTOR. You should be able to modify this for your needs.. *--* * WTOR *--* LAR2,L'REPLY

Re: WTOR problem

2012-03-19 Thread Rob Scott
WTOR and WTO are macros that require a model parameter list to be constructed and populated *before* you issue the MF=E form. Zeroing the parameter list is NOT sufficient - you must move in a model MF=L form just before the MF=E invocation. More modern macros have the ",COMPLETE" option on the