-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long
Tom Schmidt wrote:
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:17:24 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 1:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: new Feb2008 zPOP: Execute Relative Long
-snip--
Why not also allow the EXreg instruction to execute UP TO 8 bytes worth of
the register contents? In other words, if you have less than 6 byte
instructions to execute (say a 2-byte plus a 6-byte instruction) why not allow
BOTH of them to
Rick Fochtman wrote:
Let's all quit trying to second-guess IBM and instead just wait a
while. I'm certain that there will be additional upgrades as the z/10
goes through evolution. Let's see what time brings us.
Customer dialog helps influence IBM's design and direction. If customers
always
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/01/2008
at 05:11 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm reminded of the PDP-6/10/20,
There was no PDP-20. As I recall the DECSYSTEM-20 used a KL10.
where the registers were memory mapped, or the bottom 16 words of
memory were register mapped, depending on
Tom Schmidt wrote:
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be
happy now.)
Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than
On 1 Mar 2008 10:59:02 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
See SA22-7832-06 for the EXRL instruction.
(I'm sure Ed's been aware for several months now, but the rest of us may be
happy now.)
Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:00:43 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Give 'em an inch and they'll take a yard! People are already clamoring
for additional forms of EXRL that can OR the mask with other than byte
one of the target instruction! It never ends! :-)
Why not just a facility that will OR an entire
8 matches
Mail list logo
