, good.
Ed
--- On Mon, 1/3/11, Rick Fochtman wrote:
From: Rick Fochtman
Subject: Re: Review of Past IBM Drives
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Monday, January 3, 2011, 1:39 PM
---
The whole article stinks of something given
---
The whole article stinks of something given to a bored intern to
complete, and he punted after 5 minutes of research. Certainly there
were important advancements in the 1970s and 80s.
And yes, I am still looking fo
>>http://www.macworld.com/article/156758/2010/12/harddriveevolution.html?lsrc=nl_mwnws_h_crawl
>
> "first commercial computer, IBM 305 system,"
>
> FSVO "first" that I'm not familiar with.
The whole article stinks of something given to a bored intern to
complete, and he punted after 5 minutes of r
In <991288.12980...@web161410.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 12/31/2010
at 06:03 PM, Ed Gould said:
>http://www.macworld.com/article/156758/2010/12/harddriveevolution.html?lsrc=nl_mwnws_h_crawl
"first commercial computer, IBM 305 system,"
FSVO "first" that I'm not familiar with.
--
Shmuel (
Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.macworld.com/article/156758/2010/12/harddriveevolution.html?lsrc=nl_mwnws_h_crawl
---
It's pretty good, but missing info on the "modern" demountable drives,
or any of the m
http://www.macworld.com/article/156758/2010/12/harddriveevolution.html?lsrc=nl_mwnws_h_crawl
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
6 matches
Mail list logo