Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Ed Gould wrote:
snip
There is no justice in the world.
Ed
Agreed. In my first job, I had one programmer who got an S0C7 abend. I
told him it was a data
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Ed Gould wrote:
snip
There is no justice in the world.
Ed
Agreed. In my first job, I had one programmer who got an S0C7 abend. I
told him it was a data problem, look in his program to determine which
variable was bad. His response: System abend - system problem -
System abend - system problem - you fix it.
Same story everywhere.
When I started, we knew that S0C* abends were caused by application programmer
issues.
Now, if it starts with S, it has to be a system problem.
Maybe it's a good thing that LE converts them to U*** abends. (8-{]}
User abend -
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:33 AM, Ed Gouldps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
SNIP
The programmer was asked to leave but I got very annoyed as he got a
consultants job at a large insurance company here in Chicago and a very nice
pay raise.
There is no justice in the world.
I don't know about that. You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Ed Gould wrote:
snip
There is no justice in the world.
Ed
Agreed. In my first job, I had one programmer who got an S0C7 abend. I
told him it was a data problem, look in his
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009, Chase, John wrote:
Write an ESPIE to change it to a U0C7 and toss it back. :-)
-jc-
No such thing. User abends are decimal in nature, whereas system abends
are 3 character hex.
--
Trying to write with a pencil that is dull is pointless.
Maranatha!
John McKown
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009, Chase, John wrote:
Write an ESPIE to change it to a U0C7 and toss it back. :-)
-jc-
No such thing. User abends are decimal in nature, whereas system
abends
are 3
--- On Fri, 7/3/09, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I can think of no case where it is
accepted or supported for non-IBM code
to issue an IBM-documented system abend code.
And that certainly includes 222 which has many
ramifications that go with
its being a cancel'.
As we all
I can think of no case where it is accepted or supported for non-IBM code
to issue an IBM-documented system abend code.
And that certainly includes 222 which has many ramifications that go with
its being a cancel'.
As we all know, the official S222 has no reason codes.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core
In the old COBOL days, I would call XPECT806, which didn't exist, and
got what I asked for
Peter Relson wrote:
I can think of no case where it is accepted or supported for non-IBM code
to issue an IBM-documented system abend code.
And that certainly includes 222 which has many
-snip-
I can think of no case where it is accepted or supported for non-IBM
code to issue an IBM-documented system abend code.
And that certainly includes 222 which has many ramifications that go
with its being a cancel'.
As we all
Someone asked this and I did not know where to look.
They are researching an internal S222 abend. It came with a reason code.
Now, I have seen S222 due to OPER Cancel commands, but I am not familiar with
S222 abends that are issued internally and with a reason code.
Would I be correct in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: S222 abends and Reason Codes
Someone asked this and I did not know where to look
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:57:27 -0500, McKown, John jmck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: S222 abends
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: S222 abends and Reason Codes
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:57:27 -0500, McKown, John
jmck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
-Original Message
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:40:12 -0600, Roach, Dennis (N-GHG)
dennis.ro...@lmco.com wrote:
This is not an S222, it is a U222. Major difference.
snip
Of course I knew that. I've worked on this platform for a little
while. :-)Read what I wrote again:
I have also seen user 222 abends (poor
Lizette Koehler wrote:
They are researching an internal S222 abend. It came with a reason code.
Now, I have seen S222 due to OPER Cancel commands, but I am not familiar
with S222 abends that are issued internally and with a reason code.
Would I be correct in assuming that I need the person
Re: S222 abends and Reason Codes
.edu
07/02/2009 10:49
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:49:57 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Ask them if their Assembler source code contains this ABEND macro coded
more or less like this example:
ABEND 222,REASON=reason code,,,either USER or SYSTEM
For an S222, that would be
ABEND X'222',REASON=reason code,,,SYSTEM
19 matches
Mail list logo
