SDSF CPU% vs. ECPU%

I'm still confused ... here's my interpretation, based on previous postings, IBM manuals, and some googling: CPU% is time spent "on behalf of" the address space (R791TCPU) It includes all the TCB (ASCBEJST) and SRB (ASCBSRBT) time for the address space's own internal work It also includes any en

Re: SDSF CPU% vs. ECPU%

Thank you for confirming my observations, Mark . . . but . . . since the previous postings I found were several years old, gotta wonder why this is still in the SDSF help text . . . CPU%Percent of CPU time used on behalf of this address space during the m

Re: SDSF CPU% vs. ECPU%

Just discovered (I think) that ASSBASST does *NOT* include Enclave time ... so DDF CPU reported by SDSF is therefore as I suggested. [my source is Greg Dyck's March 2000 Share presentation on SRBs] The reason CPU = ECPU for CICS is because DB2 uses a Client NP-SRB (Dependent Enclave??) which *I

SDSF CPU% vs. ECPU% [re-sent as plain text]

I'm still confused ... here's my interpretation, based on previous postings, IBM manuals, and some googling: CPU% is time spent "on behalf of" the address space (R791TCPU) It includes all the TCB (ASCBEJST) and SRB (ASCBSRBT) time for the address space's own internal wo

Re: SDSF CPU% vs. ECPU% [re-sent as plain text]

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:24:35 -0500, Hugh Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If my calculation is correct, I would suggest that the correct >interpretation of the fields on my SDSF display (supposedly "vanilla") are: > > CPU-Time is the CPU Time (TCB + SRB) for the address space, > EXCLUDING any N