SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a "?". She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an "O" next to the dataset. The entire output group goes to the Output queue. I have looked at profiles and can't find what may be wron

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Cebell, David
Held queue We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a "?". She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an "O" next to the dataset. The entire output group goes to the Output queue. I have looked at profiles and

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Staller, Allan
There is an open IBM APAR on this I don't have the number handy, but last time I checked (about mid November) it was still in open status. HTH, We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a "?". She selects a specific dataset for output by

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>We have a user that displays a list of datasets in an output group in the Held queue of SDSF with a "?". >She selects a specific dataset for output by placing an "O" next to the dataset. >The entire output group goes to the Output queue. >I have looked at profiles and can't find what may be wro

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Staller, Allan
As of a few minutes ago: OA25382: AFTER OA23460, USE OF THE SDSF JDS PANEL TO MODIFY A SINGLE DATASET ATTRIBUTE CAN RESULT IN CHANGING ALL D 08/06/04 PTF PECHANGE APAR status OPEN Error description When the SDSF JDS panel is used to change attributes such as CLASS or to purge the data set,

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:22:26 -0600, Cebell, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Assuming the output from the job is under one JOBID, >It is ALL the output that will get released. > This used to be one of the areas that some of the SDSF competitors were better at, but that should work fine with SDSF

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
We are on z/OS 1.9 and the initial acess to the output was from the "H" panel. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archi

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Carl Morgan
This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://b

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. Check the $O JES2 command, which this translates to. I think the best granularity is by output class. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-03 Thread Edward Jaffe
Ted MacNEIL wrote: This should only release the one dsn and not the entire output. Check the $O JES2 command, which this translates to. I think the best granularity is by output class. We have used SAPI for a long time to get data set granularity. SDSF recently started doing the same

Re: SDSF Held queue

2008-12-05 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/03/2008 at 08:46 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >What is the problem? What he said. >You aren't very clear. The OP was perfectly clear. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see