> I have the following piece of code running on many SRBs to
> give serialisation.
>
> SETLOCK OBTAIN,
>TYPE=CML,ASCB=(11), PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE
>MODE=UNCOND,
>REGS=USE,
>RELATED=(*(S
Sorry should have added.
My situation, multiple SRBs in a single address space, some of which might be
non-dispatchable, doesn't appear to match any of the subcodes of the S073 abend.
I suspect this will be some variant of s073 but not 100% sure.
Ron.
--
Hi all,
I have the following piece of code running on many SRBs to give
serialisation.
SETLOCK OBTAIN,
TYPE=CML,ASCB=(11), PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE
MODE=UNCOND
If there are CPU or other spin locks held after the release, the PSW will
remain disabled.
If the releaser requested that the system remain disabled after the
release, the PSW will remain disabled. At some later point, the code will
re-enable.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
---
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:20:27 -0400 Bill Hecox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>I was looking at dump recently and discovered the CPU was disabled following a
:>SETLOCK OBTAIN,TYPE=IOSUCB
:>SETLOCK RELEASE,TYPE=IOSUCB
:>I would have thought the SETLOCK RELEASE would have put the
Hi,
I was looking at dump recently and discovered the CPU was disabled following a
SETLOCK OBTAIN,TYPE=IOSUCB
SETLOCK RELEASE,TYPE=IOSUCB
I would have thought the SETLOCK RELEASE would have put the CPU back
in the interrupts enabled state.
Does anyone have any additional information on this
6 matches
Mail list logo