The only alternative (as seen from the principle of least astonishment) I can
think of is using the explicit option NULL - assuming that value is never a
real option.
(With the alternatives thing2(option1) and thing2(option1,*) I would have
presumed that the first was null for option2 and the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:50 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote:
The only alternative (as seen from the principle of least astonishment) I can
think of is using the explicit option NULL - assuming that value is never a
real option.
In some contexts, such an option is unjustified. Designs should
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Paul
Gilmartin
Skickat: den 20 mars 2012 15:45
Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Ämne: Re: SV: Theology question
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:50 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote:
The only alternative (as seen
3 matches
Mail list logo