SV: Theology question

2012-03-20 Thread Thomas Berg
The only alternative (as seen from the principle of least astonishment) I can think of is using the explicit option NULL - assuming that value is never a real option. (With the alternatives thing2(option1) and thing2(option1,*) I would have presumed that the first was null for option2 and the

Re: SV: Theology question

2012-03-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:50 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote: The only alternative (as seen from the principle of least astonishment) I can think of is using the explicit option NULL - assuming that value is never a real option. In some contexts, such an option is unjustified. Designs should

SV: SV: Theology question

2012-03-20 Thread Thomas Berg
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För Paul Gilmartin Skickat: den 20 mars 2012 15:45 Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Ämne: Re: SV: Theology question On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:50 +0100, Thomas Berg wrote: The only alternative (as seen