SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display which user svc's are already taken? Thanks in advance.

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Alan C. Field
y, January 23, 2007 15:00 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SVC's Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display which use

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Varun Manocha
y: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 01/24/2007 02:29 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject SVC's Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Al Slovacek
TASID? Al -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SVC's Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out that start

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:59:39 -0600, Ward, Mike S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out >that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I >don't know which ones are already in use. Is ther

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Shane Ginnane
> Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out > that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I > don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display > which user svc's are already taken? Several tools ha

Re: SVC's

2007-01-23 Thread Skip Robinson
er). I assume you have studied "MVS Diagnosis: Reference" , GA22-7588 in my z/OS 1.8 library. Shane Ginnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 01/23/2007 04:32 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject

Re: SVC's

2007-01-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 6:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SVC's ... I suspect you are not ready to write an SVC if you aren't already fami

Re: SVC's

2007-02-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/23/2007 at 04:47 PM, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >One advantage of this SVC is that you're less likely to bump into >another exploiter because the 109 mechanism is relatively new(er). Relatively new, yes, but it still goes back decades. -- Sh