Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I
don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display
which user svc's are already taken?
Thanks in advance.
y, January 23, 2007 15:00
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SVC's
Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I
don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display
which use
y: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
01/24/2007 02:29 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
SVC's
Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I
TASID?
Al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SVC's
Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
that start
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:59:39 -0600, Ward, Mike S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
>that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I
>don't know which ones are already in use. Is ther
> Hello all, I was looking into user written svc's and I have found out
> that starting at 200 on up are available to the user. My problem is I
> don't know which ones are already in use. Is there a way to display
> which user svc's are already taken?
Several tools ha
er).
I assume you have studied "MVS Diagnosis: Reference" , GA22-7588 in my
z/OS 1.8 library.
Shane Ginnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
01/23/2007 04:32 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 6:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC's
... I suspect you are not ready to write an SVC if you aren't
already fami
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 01/23/2007
at 04:47 PM, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>One advantage of this SVC is that you're less likely to bump into
>another exploiter because the 109 mechanism is relatively new(er).
Relatively new, yes, but it still goes back decades.
--
Sh
9 matches
Mail list logo