On Nov 24, 7:01 am, George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote:
George:
It might help if you give the details of the parameters you are using
for CTGPL, CTGFL, etc.
I happened to be working on a different problem in this area, so I
tried to recreate your problem.
The returned list is the same
datasets when using
'HLQ.TEST.G' mask. I tried to find any IBM documentation about it but
without any success. Don’t you know where I can find more info about
it?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:49:59 +0100
From: kees.vern...@klm.com
Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets
To: IBM
any success. Don't you know where I can find more info about
it?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:49:59 +0100
From: kees.vern...@klm.com
Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Yes, until z/OS 1.8.
Kees
On Nov 23, 2:18 am, George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for your answers.
I still don’t understand why I can’t see all datasets when using
'HLQ.TEST.G' mask. I tried to find any IBM documentation about it but
without any success. Don’t you know where I can find more info about
it?
either.
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:57:33 +0100
From: kees.vern...@klm.com
Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Have a look at APAR II14517, this describes the z/OS 1.8 new behaviour
for GDGs.
Kees
George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote in message
news:bff74657-e6dc-4185-b7f3-fd2e24d38...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
...
Hello,
I have a question about Locate macro (SVC 26) and GDG datasets. For
example I have these datasets:
HLQ.TEST
HLQ.TEST.G0003V00
HLQ.TEST.G0004V00
HLQ.TEST.G0005V00
When I
macro (SVC 26) and GDG datasets. For
example I have these datasets:
HLQ.TEST
HLQ.TEST.G0003V00
HLQ.TEST.G0004V00
HLQ.TEST.G0005V00
When I use mask 'HLQ.TEST' the output from SVC 26 is:
HLQ.TEST
HLQ.TEST.G0004V00
HLQ.TEST.G0005V00
HLQ.TEST.G0003V00
The problem is that datasets
I meant to add that it's been this way since the '60s.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:09:51 -0500
From: jayare...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
GDG member numbers are complemented in the catalog.
This ensures that the latest
Yes, until z/OS 1.8.
Kees.
J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote in message
news:blu137-w103f36a40b790e72007332a3...@phx.gbl...
I meant to add that it's been this way since the '60s.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:09:51 -0500
From: jayare...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 08:53 -0500, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
This is the case since z/OS 1.8. GDG members are not kept in numerical
order in the catalog anymore and therefor not returned in numerical
order either. The only way to get them returned in numerical order is by
calling a new alias
10 matches
Mail list logo