Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-24 Thread Richard Pace
On Nov 24, 7:01 am, George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote: George: It might help if you give the details of the parameters you are using for CTGPL, CTGFL, etc. I happened to be working on a different problem in this area, so I tried to recreate your problem. The returned list is the same

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-23 Thread J R
datasets when using 'HLQ.TEST.G' mask. I tried to find any IBM documentation about it but without any success. Don’t you know where I can find more info about it? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:49:59 +0100 From: kees.vern...@klm.com Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets To: IBM

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-23 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
any success. Don't you know where I can find more info about it? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:49:59 +0100 From: kees.vern...@klm.com Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Yes, until z/OS 1.8. Kees

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-23 Thread rpace
On Nov 23, 2:18 am, George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote: Thanks a lot for your answers. I still don’t understand why I can’t see all datasets when using 'HLQ.TEST.G' mask. I tried to find any IBM documentation about it but without any success. Don’t you know where I can find more info about it?

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-23 Thread J R
either. Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:57:33 +0100 From: kees.vern...@klm.com Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Have a look at APAR II14517, this describes the z/OS 1.8 new behaviour for GDGs. Kees

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-20 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
George jiri.aich...@ca.com wrote in message news:bff74657-e6dc-4185-b7f3-fd2e24d38...@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com ... Hello, I have a question about Locate macro (SVC 26) and GDG datasets. For example I have these datasets: HLQ.TEST HLQ.TEST.G0003V00 HLQ.TEST.G0004V00 HLQ.TEST.G0005V00 When I

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-20 Thread J R
macro (SVC 26) and GDG datasets. For example I have these datasets: HLQ.TEST HLQ.TEST.G0003V00 HLQ.TEST.G0004V00 HLQ.TEST.G0005V00 When I use mask 'HLQ.TEST' the output from SVC 26 is: HLQ.TEST HLQ.TEST.G0004V00 HLQ.TEST.G0005V00 HLQ.TEST.G0003V00 The problem is that datasets

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-20 Thread J R
I meant to add that it's been this way since the '60s. Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:09:51 -0500 From: jayare...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu GDG member numbers are complemented in the catalog. This ensures that the latest

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-20 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Yes, until z/OS 1.8. Kees. J R jayare...@hotmail.com wrote in message news:blu137-w103f36a40b790e72007332a3...@phx.gbl... I meant to add that it's been this way since the '60s. Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:09:51 -0500 From: jayare...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: SVC 26 (locate

Re: SVC 26 (locate) with GDG datasets

2009-11-20 Thread David Andrews
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 08:53 -0500, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote: This is the case since z/OS 1.8. GDG members are not kept in numerical order in the catalog anymore and therefor not returned in numerical order either. The only way to get them returned in numerical order is by calling a new alias