On 19 Jan 2007 04:37:48 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Craddock, Chris wrote:
We started down the SYSPLEX road, but never could get hardware
resources, then dropped from 6 to 3 LPAR's after Y2K.
Setting up a ESCON CTC isn't all that difficult and won't cost you
anything except a
I said
Those old chestnuts are bogus. There is NO GOOD REASON to run
monoplexes
in preference to at least a basic sysplex.
RS said
There are. Different LPARs run different businesses, different
companies. Different security rules. Strict for production, light for
development.
If each
The previous shop I worked at had an MP3000-H50. Are you saying that
instead of 1 Prod Lpar and 1 Test Lpar, we should have had 2 Prod Lpars and
2 Test Lpars so we could run in sysplex mode? We also would need to define
a coupling facility, which I believe IBM always recommends 1 whole engine
3 matches
Mail list logo
