In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Payne) wrote:
> I've seen an IBM internal analysis of a Websphere Application Server
> implementation that was
> 37x cheaper on Intel than on zSeries.
>
> That's 37 _TIMES_ - not 37%!
Statements like this always confuse me. How can somet
Matt Simpson wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Payne) wrote:
I've seen an IBM internal analysis of a Websphere Application Server
implementation that was
37x cheaper on Intel than on zSeries.
That's 37 _TIMES_ - not 37%!
Statements like this always confuse m
In a message dated 10/13/2006 8:44:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Statements like this always confuse me. How can something be 37 times
>(or 3700%) smaller or cheaper than something else?
Since the original topic this time is the innumeracy of the masses, my
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
10/13/2006
at 09:44 AM, Matt Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Statements like this always confuse me.
Why? They should tell you something about the author.
>How can something be 37 times
>(or 3700%) smaller or cheaper than something else?
They can't.
>If say
4 matches
Mail list logo