Submit job from SYPUNCH was (fwd) Re: rexx or other macro processor on z/os?

2006-05-07 Thread Clark Morris
On 7 May 2006 02:32:09 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Mason) wrote: To the listeners, This thread was discovered in a Google digest. I did not spot it in e-mails so I can't reply correctly, that is, linking to the existing thread, nor can I produce the usual

Re: Submit job from SYPUNCH was (fwd) Re: rexx or other macro processor on z/os?

2006-05-07 Thread J R
Why don't you have SYSPUNCH SYSOUT=(*,INTRDR)? Because it's a good idea to check the assembly completion code to ensure that the generated JCL is good. That way you can avoid submitting partially and/or incorrectly built jobs to the internal reader. From: Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Submit job from SYPUNCH was (fwd) Re: rexx or other macro processor on z/os?

2006-05-07 Thread Chris Mason
Clark, Quite correct - although J R[1] has provided quite a good reason which has now been challenged by John Gilmore, such is the way with these exchanges. Although it was a Sunday morning and the brain was mostly shut down I think I was recalling how I used to do the sort of thing the original