You don't need UADS in your TSO PROC; probably better not to have it. Just
use a Rexx like this one when you want to use the ACCOUNT command:
/* REXX */
/*---
TRACE N /* Change option as needed */
/*---
;
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 28 March, 2006 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: TSO and SYS1.UADS
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/22/2006
>at 10:35 AM, Duane Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >So my question is: How does TSO know to use SYS1.UADS?
>
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/22/2006
at 10:35 AM, Duane Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>So my question is: How does TSO know to use SYS1.UADS?
Master JCL.
>Does UADS need to be defined to the TSO proc?
Do you want to use the ACCOUNT command?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg a
: TSO and SYS1.UADS
Search is the other way around: look first in RACF; if not found, look
in
UADS. This simplifies conversion to RACF. Just add a TSOE segment and
test. If there's a problem, delete the TSOE segment and you're back to
UADS. You never have to touch UADS if you choose to
Search is the other way around: look first in RACF; if not found, look in
UADS. This simplifies conversion to RACF. Just add a TSOE segment and
test. If there's a problem, delete the TSOE segment and you're back to
UADS. You never have to touch UADS if you choose to leave it as is.
.
.
JO.Skip
Subject: Re: TSO and SYS1.UADS
I'll give it a shot. I don't know if it is needed in both places, but I
have SYS1.UADS defined in the master JCL to DD SYSUADS and in the TSO
proc under DD SYSUADS as well. I believe - tho it's been eons since
I've looked at it - that TSO actually
In a message dated 3/22/2006 10:20:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SYS1.UADS is user database. You can administer the users by ACCOUNT
program. It is worth to have some entries in UADS for recovery in case
of RACF failure.
>>
If the driving system was built wit
On 3/22/2006 10:34 AM, Duane Weaver wrote:
I have a need to build a small zOS utility system. There are no plans to
put our security package on this utility system. There will be no real
data on this system to be concerned about.
Be aware that you won't have access to any UNIX-based functio
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: TSO and SYS1.UADS
I have a need to build a small zOS utility system. There are no plans
to put our security package on this utility system. There will be no
real data on this system to be concerned about.
So my question is: How does TSO know to use SYS1.UA
Duane Weaver wrote:
I have a need to build a small zOS utility system. There are no plans to
put our security package on this utility system. There will be no real
data on this system to be concerned about.
So my question is: How does TSO know to use SYS1.UADS? Does UADS need
to be defin
I have a need to build a small zOS utility system. There are no plans
to put our security package on this utility system. There will be no
real data on this system to be concerned about.
So my question is: How does TSO know to use SYS1.UADS? Does UADS
need to be defined to the TSO proc?
11 matches
Mail list logo
