Jochen Roehrig jochen.roeh...@baloise.ch wrote in message
news:listserv%200907130958193156.0...@bama.ua.edu...
I ran some additional tests:
F CATALOG,REPORT,CACHE shows that VLF caches date even with LLA down.
LLA with NOFREEZE always returns the actual member.
I'll do some further tests
I ran some additional tests:
F CATALOG,REPORT,CACHE shows that VLF caches date even with LLA down.
LLA with NOFREEZE always returns the actual member.
I'll do some further tests with LLA down and VLFDATA RETRIEVE.
Jochen
--
first tests with VLF CLASS
NAME(IKJEXEC) and
no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not
cache
members from IKJEXEC EDSN definitions. Any prerequisites required to
benefit
from VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)?
Thanks in advance,
Jochen
LLA can use VLF, VLF does not use
Thanks everybody for the comments.
Mark is right: pls do not use this issue to discuss the pros and cons of
LLA/VLF versus PMO/Quickfetch. I just need some advise how best to use VLF's
Class IKJEXEC with no LLA up and running...
Yes, we also use other classes with VLF, e.g. IGGCAS. I need some
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:44:18 -0500, Jochen Roehrig
jochen.roeh...@baloise.ch wrote:
Thanks everybody for the comments.
Mark is right: pls do not use this issue to discuss the pros and cons of
LLA/VLF versus PMO/Quickfetch. I just need some advise how best to use VLF's
Class IKJEXEC with no LLA up
Jochen Roehrig jochen.roeh...@baloise.ch wrote in message
news:listserv%200907080744180074.0...@bama.ua.edu...
Thanks everybody for the comments.
Mark is right: pls do not use this issue to discuss the pros and cons
of
LLA/VLF versus PMO/Quickfetch. I just need some advise how best to use
Hello,
is LLA STC required to benefit from VLF's CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)?
We think about running our system with no LLA STC, because we use some ISV's
solution instead of LLA. But my first tests with VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC) and
no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not cache
(IKJEXEC) and
no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not cache
members from IKJEXEC EDSN definitions. Any prerequisites required to benefit
from VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)?
It's documented that the operation of LLA is not dependent on VLF (although
it can benefit from VLF
In a message dated 7/7/2009 11:04:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mark.zel...@zurichna.com writes:
the first I've heard of it. But I'm pretty sure at shops I've been at that
ran something like PMO/Quickfetch still ran LLA also.
Do you have any other classes defined that you can check?
(IKJEXEC) and
no LLA up an running fail. Means: it looks like that VLF does not cache
members from IKJEXEC EDSN definitions. Any prerequisites required to benefit
from VLF CLASS NAME(IKJEXEC)?
Thanks in advance,
Jochen
LLA is written to use the interface to VLF. Any APF program can use VLF to
cache
But I'm pretty sure at shops I've been at that ran something like
PMO/Quickfetch still ran LLA also.
When we got LLA (XA?). I led the charge to get rid of Q/F. It saved us a large
chunk of change, and it performed quite well.
VLF (ESA?) made it even better.
-
Too busy driving to stop for
The last to appends don't seem to address what I think the OP is asking.
If I understand correct, the issue is this:
1) The OP has a product that replaces LLA functionality and does not run LLA
(but does run VLF.
2) The OP is using the IKJEXEC VLF class, but does not see it being used
3) The
12 matches
Mail list logo
