Re: VMWare more reliable

On 15 May 2008 10:09:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craddock, Chris) wrote: >I loved the comment "The least stable part of ESX is usually the >administrator. The code is virtually bomb-proof." That is pretty much >the case with every major piece of technology today. People are the >problem. 8^) (

Re: VMWare more reliable

> than the mainframe. Or so it was reported back in January... > > http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?editorialsid=2400#reliable > > But disputed... > > Watch the wrap. > > http://serverspecs.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/05/13/vmware-esx-more- > reliable-than-the-mainframe-says-mag/?track

Re: VMWare more reliable

On Wed, 14 May 2008 12:30:41 -0400, Gary Green wrote: >than the mainframe. Or so it was reported back in January... > >http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?editorialsid=2400#reliable > >But disputed... > >Watch the wrap. > >http://serverspecs.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/05/13/vmware-esx-more-

Re: VMWare more reliable

I did not notice. As you said, interesting... On Wed May 14 13:59 , Tony Harminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >2008/5/14 Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> than the mainframe. Or so it was reported back in January... >> >> http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp\?editorialsid=2400#reliable > >

Re: VMWare more reliable

2008/5/14 Gary Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > than the mainframe. Or so it was reported back in January... > > http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?editorialsid=2400#reliable Interesting that Google Desktop's malware warning is triggered by this site. Tony H. ---

VMWare more reliable

than the mainframe. Or so it was reported back in January... http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?editorialsid=2400#reliable But disputed... Watch the wrap. http://serverspecs.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/05/13/vmware-esx-more-reliable-than-the-mainframe-says-mag/?track=NL-576&ad=639921&asr