Paul,
>I have an application that has several VSAM datasets.
>These datasets currently use NSR (Non Shared Resources).
>
>The Application is written in assembler.
>I want to switch some of the Files to use LSR.
>If two files share a buffer pool do I need to concern my self with
>the contents of th
, 2009 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: VSAM LSR
The access method (VSAM) manages the buffer pool and buffer lookasides. You
just issue the GET(s).
You must build the LSR pool before the OPEN of each VSAM file. If the
datasets have different data/index CISIZES, you will need to
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of esst...@juno.com
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: VSAM LSR
I have an application that has several VSAM datasets.
These datasets currently use NSR (Non Shared Resources).
The Application is written in assembler.
I want to
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of esst...@juno.com
>
> I have an application that has several VSAM datasets.
> These datasets currently use NSR (Non Shared Resources).
>
> The Application is written in assembler.
> I want to switch some of the Files t
I have an application that has several VSAM datasets.
These datasets currently use NSR (Non Shared Resources).
The Application is written in assembler.
I want to switch some of the Files to use LSR.
If two files share a buffer pool do I need to concern my self with
the contents of the buffer pool
This is a followup to my series of questions about BLSR/SMB/LSR statistics
back in May of this year. My capacity and performance gurus queried IBM at
my request and came back to me to say that there ARE no VSAM LSR statistics
sent to SMF.
Can anyone here confirm or deny this statement? My C&a
6.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Heads Up: OA17292 Data Loss with VSAM LSR Hiperspace
Did that answer originate from DFSMS suppor
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:00:27 -0500, Brian Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The APAR text mentions IMS as being exposed. The defect, however, is
>within VSAM. I do not know if other VSAM LSR exploiters (such as CICS) are
>affected. I have asked that question.
>
That
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:00:27 -0500, Brian Peterson wrote:
>
> > I do not know if other VSAM LSR exploiters (such as CICS)
> >are affected. I have asked that quest
The question's answer is "IMS and VSAM only are exposed. CICS is not."
Brian
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:00:27 -0500, Brian Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not know if other VSAM LSR exploiters (such as CICS) are
>affected.
posed. The defect, however, is
within VSAM. I do not know if other VSAM LSR exploiters (such as CICS) are
affected. I have asked that question.
Interestingly, one of the APAR symptoms is errors flagged by an IMS pointer
checker utility. I am unaware of a "pointer checker" for CICS VS
11 matches
Mail list logo
