WLM and skip clock

(Cross posted) Esteemed listers In some past posts, while discussing about WLM, someone introduced 'skip clock' concept to describe behaviour of wlm when goals are not reached, for instance because they are quite high and there isn't enough to boost them. In this case wlm ignores them

Re: WLM and skip clock

In some past posts, while discussing about WLM, someone introduced 'skip clock' concept to describe behaviour of wlm when goals are not reached, for instance because they are quite high and there isn't enough to boost them. In this case wlm ignores them (or leaves them with reached velocity

Re: WLM and skip clock

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:12:39 -0500, Max Scarpa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Cross posted) Esteemed listers In some past posts, while discussing about WLM, someone introduced 'skip clock' concept to describe behaviour of wlm when goals are not reached, for instance because they are quite high

Re: WLM and skip clock

Hi Adam I've found it, thank you very much Max Scarpa -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: WLM and skip clock

In some past posts, while discussing about WLM, someone introduced 'skip clock' concept to describe behaviour of wlm when goals are not reached, for instance because they are quite high and there isn't enough to boost them. In this case wlm ignores them (or leaves them with reached velocity

Re: WLM and skip clock

Hi Mark, thank you for your reply I read it in redbook as well but as you said there's no 'direct' reference to skip clock concept, only a generic delay (skip) as it was considered useless to help that workload due to unattainable goals. Best regards Max Scarpa