In 201005281350494768...@163.com, on 05/28/2010
at 01:50 PM, ibmnew ibm...@163.com said:
2.Running the REXX on batch
You don't allocate the SDSF libraries. Why would you expect SDSF to
work without its libraries?
I don't know whether SDSF needs[1] ISPF libraries, but it certainly
needs its
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:02:50 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
2.Running the REXX on batch
You don't allocate the SDSF libraries. Why would you expect SDSF to
work without its libraries?
I don't know whether SDSF needs[1] ISPF libraries, but it certainly
needs its own.
As I said earlier, I
Information about the SDSF REXX interface is in manual SDSF Operation and
Customization (http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/r11pdf/#sdsf).
SDSF command WHO may reveal information useful to solving this problem.
- Don Imbriale
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:50 AM, ibmnew ibm...@163.com
If you use the REDBOOK - which is very good - Then I would include the
following two lines of code prior to issuing the SDSF environment
alloc f(ISFTRACE) sysout(a)
ISFTRMASK = 'ALL'
This could help you in batch determine any errors.
REDBOOK:Implementing REXX Support in SDSF SG24-7419-00
The JCL you are running is just TSO. You need to include the ISPF and SDSF
libraries to allow some of these functions.
So you need to have ISPPROF, ISPPLIB, ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB, ISPTLIB which have
the SDSF and ISPF Libraries.
You could run JCL that almost looks like your TSO/ISPF Logon proc JCL to
ADDRESS SDSF does not require ISPF.
The old SDSF access routines do need ISPF, but the interface that came
with 1.9 does not.
Regards
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 28 May 2010 12:36
To:
Concur, however, there are a different set of ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB,...
(usually included in the TSO concat for those files) that are still
required to be present.
snip
ADDRESS SDSF does not require ISPF.
The old SDSF access routines do need ISPF, but the interface that came
with 1.9 does not.
/snip
Thanks for clarifying. I usually include all rather than try to remember
which is needed for what process. That way I am covered.
Lizette
Concur, however, there are a different set of ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB,...
(usually included in the TSO concat for those files) that are still
required to be
On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:01:46 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote:
Concur, however, there are a different set of ISPMLIB, ISPSLIB,...
(usually included in the TSO concat for those files) that are still
required to be present.
And I mostly disagree with that, although I can't dispute the OP's
observation.
Paul
Our shop is z/OS 1.9 with parallel sysplex,Could you tell me how to find the
reason ?
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
ADDRESS SDSF does not require ISPF.
The old SDSF access routines do need ISPF, but the interface that came
with 1.9 does not.
Regards
Paul
-Original
Dear all
I use ISRDDN to create a Clist
Below is my JCL
//SYSTEM EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=30,REGION=4096K
//SYSEXEC DD DSN=IBMSE03.REXX,DISP=SHR
//SYSTSPRT DD DSN=IBMSE03.REPORT(TEMP),DISP=SHR
//ISPPROF DD DSN=IBMSE03.ISPF.ISPPROF,DISP=SHR
//ISPPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=DSN910.SDSNPFPE
Paul
Could you sent it to me.My email is ibm...@163.com Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
发件人： Paul Gilmartin
发送时间： 2010-05-28 20:52:33
收件人： IBM-MAIN
抄送：
主题： Re: Why the ISFROWS1 is diffenent between on batch with under ISPF/PDF
On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:01:46 -0500, Staller,
I have the following questions :
1.Running my REXX under ISPF/PDF
under ispf p.6
EX TEST.BJSP55.ZTB9TMP(SCHDA04)
TEST.BJSP55.ZTB9TMP(SCHDA04)
/* REXX */
RC=ISFCALLS(ON)
ISFOWNER =CCBSP02
13 matches
Mail list logo
