* Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: 19 May 2009 19:43
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: common area [E]CSA
==
"McKown, John"
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
05/19/2009 01:43 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy
I'm reading the paper about IB
McKown, John wrote:
Is AR mode that much more difficult / restrictive than AMODE(64)?
Most HLL have no support for data spaces.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> Unless there has been a change, dataspaces are limited to 2G.
> Takes a lot of
> dataspaces to map 100G. And one must screw around with a lot of ALETs.
>
> But I am glad some people are considering VSCR for 64 bit storage.
On Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:20 -0500 "McKown, John"
wrote:
:>I'm reading the paper about IBM's plans for the 64-bit common (HVCOMMON?).
And I'm really beginning to wonder about something. What this will do is create
another block of storage which is mapped into every address space. I am curious
I'm reading the paper about IBM's plans for the 64-bit common (HVCOMMON?). And
I'm really beginning to wonder about something. What this will do is create
another block of storage which is mapped into every address space. I am curious
why IBM has not considered using AR mode and a SCOPE=GLOBAL d
6 matches
Mail list logo
