Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-10 Thread Paul Hanrahan
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ibm-main Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 6:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio It's o.k. Bruce - my skin is a bit thicker than that. Normally I sign all my mail, but it was after

Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-09 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Bruce Black wrote: Hello, Mr. Anonymous Poster, which crud are you referring to? And why do you choose to remain anonymous? Anonymous?? Huh??? You don't recognize our old Aussie pal Shane Ginnane after all these years???! It should be pretty obvious what he's referring to. Posts about

Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-09 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/9/2005 11:08:10 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anonymous?? Huh??? You don't recognize our old Aussie pal Shane Ginnane after all these years???! How do we know it's not being forged?

Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-09 Thread Bruce Black
Sorry, Shane, no offense intended. I never pay any attention to the actual email addresses, just the names in the email address or signature block, so I would never have known that was from you. But I do have a general issue with folks who post messages with no indication of their actual

Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-09 Thread Matthew Stitt
Yes, but we've all forgotten the main way to kill a thread. Nobody mentioned Adolph Hitler yet. g http://www.science.uva.nl/~mes/jargon/g/godwinslaw.html from: http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0301L=ibm-mainD=0I=1X=2E6F8324BB6F6604CAY=mstitt%40mindspring.comP=96069

Re: poor signal-to-noise ratio

2005-06-09 Thread ibm-main
It's o.k. Bruce - my skin is a bit thicker than that. Normally I sign all my mail, but it was after midnight, and I had had a gutful of the drivel, and just stormed off to bed. Shane ... - Original Message - From: Bruce Black Sorry, Shane, no offense intended. I never pay any