On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:48:43 +, john gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> ... I can in fact think
>of no---circumstances in which it is excusable to write
>non-reentrant code.
Do you consider the architecture to be deficient because it does
not provide for the separation of data and instru
john gilmore wrote:
Chris Craddock wrote:
In practice those limitations are trivially defeated, which is one of
the many reasons I maintain
that non-reentrant modules are just a bad idea and ought to be
avoided, especially by privileged
code.
My view is less charitable. There are now fe
Chris Craddock wrote:
In practice those limitations are trivially defeated, which is one of the
many reasons I maintain
that non-reentrant modules are just a bad idea and ought to be avoided,
especially by privileged
code.
My view is less charitable. There are now few if any---I can in
3 matches
Mail list logo
