Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-25 Thread Rob Scott
David, You can use some freeware tools or "IPCS ACTIVE" to display the SVC table and then browse the storage at the enrty point for SVC 26 - if you are lucky the vendor of the intercept might have left some eye-catchers. Freeware tools such as TASID, SHOWMVS and MXI can display the SVC table - th

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-25 Thread David Day
Go dump the module, it ought to have some kind of an eyecatcher to tell whose it is. - Original Message - From: "David Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:08 PM Subject: Who intercepted SVC 26? I was skulking around to

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-25 Thread Bob Rutledge
This is all well and good and easy if only one enterprising piece of software has updated the SVC. Otherwise, you'll have to scan the code and hope something obvious falls out. For example, on my systems all three updaters of SVC 26 are CA things and each of them happens to stash the previous en

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-25 Thread Bruce Hewson
David, On my system, TASID SVC display shows:- SVC Table SVC___ Address Name Amode Type APF ESR NP Assist __Locks__ _Storage__ 026 1A 80BB623831 3/4Assist | | | | | |CSA When I dump t

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi David, Do you have CA-Allocate (VAM) on the system? Thanks! <*BobL*> -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Who intercepted SVC 26?

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread David Andrews
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 07:22 -0700, Lester, Bob wrote: >Do you have CA-Allocate (VAM) on the system? No, we don't. I installed TASID a few years ago, then let it languish and eventually it fell out. Have to look at it again I suppose. (And at right-angles to the topic at hand: what is Doug N

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Rob Scott
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: 26 January 2007 09:41 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26? On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 07:22 -0700, Lester, Bob wrote: >Do you have CA-Allocate (VAM) on

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 1/26/2007 8:52:35 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TASID is now being maintained by the ISPF Development team (well done guys!) - version 5.12 is the latest I believe. >> Are they in Perth? -

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Rob Scott
TED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell Sent: 26 January 2007 10:12 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26? In a message dated 1/26/2007 8:52:35 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: TASID is now being maintained by the ISPF Development team (well done guys!) - vers

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 1/26/2007 9:15:10 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yep - it was transferred down there a few years back. >> Don't know if it was a sideways demotion or just another way of deflating Raleigh. Maybe somebody will write a book...or post a video on yo

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26? >Are they in Perth? Yep - it was transferred down there a few years back. I

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Rob Scott
: 26 January 2007 11:03 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Who intercepted SVC 26

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-26 Thread Bob Rutledge
David, In IPCS option 0, set the source to "active" and then enter ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512) This will show you who's actually handling SVC 26 (it's CVT->SVCT->SVCTABLE->entry for SVC 26->entry point). ip l 10?+c8?+88?+270? str l(512) will show who was previously handling SVC 26 (it's

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-28 Thread Steve Pryor
Ken- Various DTS Software products such as ACC and SRS do indeed front-end SVC 26, as do many other vendor products, SVC 26 being used for almost everything interesting in z/OS. (In fact you may have other products hooked at this point with ACC/SRS simply being the most recent). Normally, vendor S

re; who intercepted svc-26

2007-01-29 Thread Kenneth J. Kripke
Some additional notes: If you want to manually look at the SVCTABLE, do the following: Bring up IPCS with a SOURCE setting as ACTIVE. Make sure you issue an IP DROPD to drop any previous analysis from a browse ACTIVE storage session. Go into browse...Option 1 Issue the following: L 10.?+C

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread David Andrews
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:07 -0500, Bob Rutledge wrote: > In IPCS option 0, set the source to "active" and then enter > ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512) Bob, thanks for this (and thanks to Rob Scott, Ken Kripke, and other folks who also pointed me to IPCS -- it's been so long I'd forgotten about it)

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread Tony Harminc
Bob Rutledge wrote: > In IPCS option 0, set the source to "active" and then enter > > ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512) > > This will show you who's actually handling SVC 26 (it's > CVT->SVCT->SVCTABLE->entry for SVC 26->entry point). It's probably a lot faster to do the same thing using TSO TES

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread Bob Rutledge
Nah. That would be way too easy! :-) Bob, clearly spending way too much time in dumps. Tony Harminc wrote: Bob Rutledge wrote: In IPCS ... It's probably a lot faster to do the same thing using TSO TEST. Essentially the same syntax, but you'll need dots after the address (optional in IPCS u

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:34:19 -0500 Tony Harminc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>Bob Rutledge wrote: :>> In IPCS option 0, set the source to "active" and then enter :>> ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512) :>> This will show you who's actually handling SVC 26 (it's :>> CVT->SVCT->SVCTABLE->entry for

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>You mean that there are others that know how to use TEST? >I am not alone? We are getting more 'aloner' every year. (8-{<} - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread Shane
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 11:25 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > You mean that there are others that know how to use TEST? > > I am not alone? I hear tell that there are even some sick puppies that prefer it as a diagnostic tool. In preference to specialist ISV tools ... Some of us, of course, just

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread Bruce Black
The culprit appeared to be... FDR! That was a surprise to me, so I went digging in the installation parms and discovered that we'd configured it to use a "catalog locate exit" for auto recall. Guess when Bruce says "locate exit" he means "front-end SVC 26" since there isn't a locate exit anymor

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread Bruce Black
I should mention an easier alternative to all the TEST and IPCS options that have been offered. If you go to ISPF 6 and enter "FDRDEBUG SYS" you will get a display that includes a lot of system information, including the eyecatchers of the top level intercept for SVC 26. -- Bruce A. Black S

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-01 Thread David Andrews
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 11:31 -0500, Bruce Black wrote: > Actually there is still a "locate exit" - in the SVC 26 module > IGC0002F, there is a CSECT IGG026DU ... which was co-opted by HSM a long time ago, right? -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-02 Thread Steven Conway
Bruce Black posted: >> If you go to ISPF 6 and enter "FDRDEBUG SYS" you will get a display Sweet! I have a couple of systems without any kind of monitor product, and this gives a nice display of storage. Thanks, Bruce. Steve Conway Lead Systems Programmer Information Systems & Services Divisi

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-02 Thread Bruce Black
Sweet! I have a couple of systems without any kind of monitor product, and this gives a nice display of storage. Thanks, Bruce. Ur welcome. FDRDEBUG has a lot of other function as well. If the customer has the ABR ISPF panels installed, go to the ABR main menu (usually A) and enter B to g

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-02 Thread Steven Conway
Bruce Black posted: >>Ur welcome. FDRDEBUG has a lot of other function as well. Great stuff, Bruce. Thanks again. I wonder what other products we have in-house have nifty, not-obvious commands and/or displays. Cheers,,,Steve Steve Conway Lead Systems Programmer Information Systems & Servic

Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-02-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/01/2007 at 11:25 AM, Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >You mean that there are others that know how to use TEST? Lot's, but most won't admit it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see