Re: z890, HMC, LPAR Numbers?

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:15:28 -0600, Barry Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There is a recent change that changed the meaning of the LPAR Number in SMF records: > >APAR II13668 said that after z990s, LPARNUM (SMF70LPN) was no longer a >static identifier, but instead is now a system gener

Re: z890, HMC, LPAR Numbers?

There is a recent change that changed the meaning of the LPAR Number in SMF records: APAR II13668 said that after z990s, LPARNUM (SMF70LPN) was no longer a static identifier, but instead is now a system generated number of the alphabetical location of the LPAR name, and the LPARNUM of

Re: z890, HMC, LPAR Numbers?

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:43:39 -0500, Kittendorf, Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We have our z890 up and running one test LPAR. We noticed that the LPAR >numbers showing up in SMF and SHOWMVS are not the same as the MIF image >id or LPAR numbers we entered in the profiles through the HMC. Shou

z890, HMC, LPAR Numbers?

Hi, We have our z890 up and running one test LPAR. We noticed that the LPAR numbers showing up in SMF and SHOWMVS are not the same as the MIF image id or LPAR numbers we entered in the profiles through the HMC. Should SMF report the MIF image id, or perhaps is this the order the profiles were def