On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:45:30 -0500 Micheal Burn michealb...@optonline.net
wrote:
:I read and searched chapter 9 of the authorized assembler guide and it
:Didn't see any restriction on subpool
:Usage for a program running in SRB mode
:I did the same looking at the storage macro
:My question was
Hi
Thank you, maybe another question:
For the HSM exits, seems to me the HSM ignores the STEPLIB, they are
coming from LNKLST(Z/OS 1.13)
On 10.12.2012 19:18, Glenn Wilcock wrote:
Hi,
I can't go into details, but you can find the basics in the DFSMShsm Diagnosis manual
(GC52-1083-07).
In 29be1df5-b6be-4988-8fad-60b8e01d4039@blur, on 12/08/2012
at 10:29 PM, zatlas1 zatl...@yahoo.com said:
X'ac' is a valid code
It is a valid ISO-8859-1 code; it is not a valid ASCII code.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2http://patriot.net/~shmuel
We
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea0116565f...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 12/07/2012
at 12:46 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Could this be what you are wanting?
Close; the text you cited is for storage allocation by the program;
I'm talking about sections in a program
In
cae1xxdhy9jrnlpgyqua9nq_pqbel8oibj-ykwwhr357f9ln...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/08/2012
at 11:39 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
I have grown very tired of your absurd, moralistic comments.
K3wl; I've grown tired of your lies.
You convert all disagreement with you into vice.
There
In
CAE1XxDEJD+VPiOKQWV=pwofs3xsbo2ppmc0n_bu7qko8vy7...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/09/2012
at 08:27 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
This view may well be appropriate and adequate to the things Shmuel
wants to do with data. My shared-tables system proceeds otherwise.
You have not,
In 50c4b54e.70...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 12/09/2012
at 07:59 AM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
I assume this is for non-reentrant code only.
Certainly non-refreshable, and probably non-reentrant in most cases.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
I had to break up a job recently due to too many steps... There is a limit.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I was planning to use storage obtain/storage release for the amount of storage
needed with the ALET parameter.
How to do get storage in a dataspace?
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=4096,SP=0,ALET=ASALET,LOC=ANY,ADDR=ASADDR
Release storage:
STORAGE RELEASE,LENGTH=4096,ALET=ASALET,ADDR=ASADDR,SP=0
the output from todsn will tell me the number of bytes transferred. It does not
tell me the output volume serial number(s). Of course, I can use another
utility immediately afterwards, catsearch, to find the first output volume and
use it for the CA-1 control cards, allowing TMSUPDTE to run the
Hi,
Firstly I like to thank Jim Mulder for answering my question
I do believe I looked thru the manuals and could not find an answer to my
question
However if everybody says I didn't spend enough time doing research then .
I'll go thru the books a second or third time before I
John,
See if you can run TMSUPDTE in your process. TMSUPDTE can update your
expiration dates to CA1. I use it in batch processes rather than use the
CA1 ISPF interface.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Of
Hello Gadi
-- Original Message --
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:13:25 +0200
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
From: ??? ?? ??? gad...@malam.com
Subject: Parked Processors
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hi,
We just upgraded to z/OS 1.13
Is there anyone else having issues with the IBM site for downloading the hold
data? (service.boulder.ibm.com 170.225.15.26 port: 21) I am timing out.
Thanks.
John Eatherly
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Donald,
When you create the dataspace, you specify an initial and a maximum size on
DSPSERV CREATE. The initial size is allocated and ready to use right away.
If you later want to increase the size of the dataspace (up to the maximum
specified on CREATE), use DSPSERV EXTEND.
HTH,
Steven
Hi
I am trying to use SyncSort for zOS V1.4.0.1R to deblock a file.
For each input record, I want to write the first 82 bytes as output record 1,
followed by the next 82 bytes as output record 2,
followed by the next 82 bytes as output record 3,
and so on until all 22 output records
Try :
OPTION COPY
OUTFIL FNAMES=SORTOUT,OUTREC=(0001,0082,/,0083,0082,/,0165,0082)
-frank
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gary Jacek
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Override the attributes on input?
RECFM=FB,LRECL=82,BLKSIZE=1804.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Gary Jacek gary.ja...@shaw.ca wrote:
Hi
I am trying to use SyncSort for zOS V1.4.0.1R to deblock a file.
For each input record, I want to write the first 82 bytes as output record 1,
Frank, I owe you a virtual beverage of your choice.
This was the solution:
OPTION COPY
OUTFIL FNAMES=PIECES,OUTREC=(0001,0082,/, +
0083,0082,/, +
0165,0082,/,
Frank,
I am happy that your application is working but changing from a SORT to a COPY
should not have had that effect. Is it possible that you are using an existing
data set for the output on the SORT that had an LRECL already coded or was
there DCB in the JCL?
If you want to just move on I
He had //PEICES DD SYSOUT=*.
So JESn assigned printer attributes to the output file.
Still think the override of the DCB is cleaner, does not require
calculation of each record boundary.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Reda, John jr...@syncsort.com wrote:
Frank,
I am happy that your
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:27:01 -0600, Mike Schwab wrote:
Override the attributes on input?
RECFM=FB,LRECL=82,BLKSIZE=1804.
You could probably do it with IEBGENER or IDCAMS REPRO with
suitable overrides on SYSUT1 and SYSUT2.
-- gil
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Gary Jacek wrote:
I am
I've never used it, but this seems to be a basic function of IEBGENER(and
therefore SYNC/ICE GENER)
.8.2.5 RECORD Statement
The RECORD statement is used to define a record group and to supply editing
information. A record group consists of records that are to be processed
identically.
In
caarmm9tcdidwxyr7mcg003ap8qjrvtbthoc9txte3ed_wqo...@mail.gmail.com,
on 12/10/2012
at 07:37 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net said:
Some even older of us will remember that in pre-MVS days those
3-byte values were TTRs in SYS1.SYSJOBQ, and it was a pleasant if
short-lived and short-sighted
On 12/11/2012 3:44 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've never used it, but this seems to be a basic function of IEBGENER(and
therefore SYNC/ICE GENER)
.8.2.5 RECORD Statement
All this is overkill. A simple gener will do:
// EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD
OK, I think the discussion forked about 3 different ways, based upon a
misunderstanding.
Here is a simple input record, with 6 groups of 3 bytes.
AAABBBCCCDDDEEEFFF
Here is what I want out of it, 6 rows of 3 bytes.
AAA
BBB
CCC
DDD
EEE
FFF
I tested the following solution using both a dataset
Gerhard, I just tried this - what a hoot! I never would have thought of
it...Thanks for such a simple suggestion - I will keep this JCL around!
Billy
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.netwrote:
On 12/11/2012 3:44 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I've never used it,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:04:00 -0600, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
I double checked and SVC 99 has two keys, DALEXPDT DALEXPDL, to assign
expiration dates. It would be very helpful to me if BPXWDYN could use these as
well because I want the equivalent of EXPDT=99000 for
In the DFSMS exits book, there is a sentence:
Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the
LNKLST concatenation (job or step libraries).
, but seems to me STEPLIB is ignored somehow.
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:56:39 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote:
Given that it's BPX... wouldn't the MVS-OE mailing list be likely to get you
closer to the developer at IBM?
Well, yes, and I believe the developer at IBM doesn't frequent IBM-MAIN,
and I'd expect that John M. knows that.
OTOH, it's
(Does this belong in ISPF-L or IBM-MAIN?)
I have some CSECTS with mixed case names, so declared
in ++ MOD CSECT() parameters. I notice that in the ISPF SMP/E
panels their names are converted to UPPER CASE. I'm trying
to track down a problem where RESTORE is not generating
REPLACE statements for
31 matches
Mail list logo
