The last couple of months Europe found out they were eating a lot of
horse meat labeled as beef. Romania banned horse pulled vehicles, so
a lot of animals went to slaughter. And there wasn't enough of a
market, so they started selling it as beef in Europe. Burger King
horse whoppers, Taco Bell h
Hi,
Best way to do all of this , is with an SVC because your GETSP231 needs
to be in an authorized library and linked with AC(1) for the modeset to
work and if you have any non authorized loadlib , on the steplib
chain, the MODESET in GETSP231 would not work...
Note: In the old days, the
In <1365195522.28100.yahoomail...@web126204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, on
04/05/2013
at 01:58 PM, Scott Ford said:
> ST R1,0(R5) RETURN ADDR, IF ANY
ST R1,0(R10) RETURN ADDR, IF ANY
?
> rc = GETSP231(&fullwd2,&fullwd1,&rc);
That would be 4 parameters; S
>>I have a Fiscal year 1978 ADP Price List here - what specific model
>>would you like me to look up?
>
> 3033 (3031 and 3032 if they have AP versions)
>
> 3158-3
>
> 3168-3
Sorry, I was pulled away out of town. I will try to get to this next week.
--
Will
---
I don't know much about the secrets of the LE linkage macros like
EDCPRLG, but:
why are the parameter addresses loaded starting from 4(R1)?
If there is nothing special about the address list and linkage OS,
I would expect
LM R9,R11,0(R1)
not 4(R1)
this should bring the addresses of the 3 pa
On 5 April 2013 17:27, Thomas H Puddicombe wrote:
> Should R5 be instead R10?
>
> If so, whose foot was R5 pointing to?
It could've been worse... The lack of a comma in
STR1,0(R5)
means at the least the foot was a fairly local one.
Scott, I'm more curious about how the C program is ever go
Many years ago, my first APF authorized program was to solve the normal vs.
the abnormal DISP problem for utility programs that trap and prevent abends.
At the time I was too green to realize that there were many public domain
solutions readily available (via tape, there was no Internet, yet), so I
Also, it would be much less dangerous if the results were stored in the
caller's arguments AFTER the MODESET KEY=NZERO. You would have to save R1 and
R15 in other registers before the MODESET, perhaps R0 and R9.
Bill
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:27:18 -0400, Thomas H Puddicombe wrote:
>Should R5 be i
Should R5 be instead R10?
If so, whose foot was R5 pointing to?
Tom
Vacation Notice: None
Tom Puddicombe
Mainframe Performance & Capacity Planning
CSC
31 Brookdale Rd, Meriden, CT 06450
ITIS | (860) 428-3252 | tpudd...@csc.com | www.csc.com
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the in
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:06:07 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>Which is why forkexecm() is not a good way to run what is really a batch
>program. I generally use ADDRESS TSO in my REXX CGIs to run anything other
>than UNIX commands (I tend to use bpxwunix() for UNIX commands). If I need
>to, I write a TSO
Guys:
I have an Assembler routine below i want to call in C. I have changed it to be
LE conforming.
GETSP231 START 0
GETSP231 AMODE 31
GETSP231 RMODE ANY
EDCPRLG BASEREG=R12,DSALEN=WORKLEN
USING LGINWORK,R13 SAVEAREA AND LOCAL VARS
*-
>http://news.yahoo.com/software-tool-z-os-developers-announced-arney-
computer-071617612.html<
Arney Computer Systems announces a new debugging tool for developers
of software for IBM mainframes running the z/OS operating system. It
uses the most advanced facilities of the System z hardware
Wow, thanks for the info John!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX calling an authorized program.
Which is why forkexecm() is
You're both on Yahoo. I wonder if they are filtering out IBM-MAIN or the
entire listserv.ua.edu domain.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Mark Regan wrote:
> I haven't seen anything from the list since Tuesday. I checked the
> archives and I see that postings are being archived, but I also saw th
Which is why forkexecm() is not a good way to run what is really a batch
program. I generally use ADDRESS TSO in my REXX CGIs to run anything other
than UNIX commands (I tend to use bpxwunix() for UNIX commands). If I need
to, I write a TSO REXX program which does the ALLOCATE commands for the DDs
I haven't seen anything from the list since Tuesday. I checked the archives and
I see that postings are being archived, but I also saw that someone else had
noticed that they had not received anything since Tuesday too.
Thanks,
Mark Regan
<><
Thank you Gil, you were very helpful!!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX calling an authorized program.
On Apr 5, 2013,
On Apr 5, 2013, at 10:57, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
>
> I tried using forkexecm and it worked, the only thing is that only TASKLIB,
> STEPLIB, or JOBLIB DD data set allocations are propagated to the new process,
> do you have any idea how to make allocations on the new ASID?
>
> -Original Message
My apology. RC39 is pretty much a knee jerk reaction. It's not what you wrote
but rather what I saw.
Also I seem to have posted twice, certainly not what I intended.
Unless somebody can offer a definitive answer to your query, you might want to
follow up with IBM.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Co
Gil, you are good at this!
I tried using forkexecm and it worked, the only thing is that only TASKLIB,
STEPLIB, or JOBLIB DD data set allocations are propagated to the new process,
do you have any idea how to make allocations on the new ASID?
Thanks!
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ma
Dave, Allen...where are we coming up with racf and arc1139?...the error is from
hsm audit:
I have alter to the dsn profile.
The hsm storage admin guide has this for err 39...nothing about racf:
*ERR 39 userdsn IS MISSING version
The BCDS data set (B) record for userdsn refers to a backup version
If a program object is bound with the LONGPARM attribute, will it be possible
to invoke that module via BPX1EXM with a PARM > 100 bytes without defining
a profile for the FACILITY class resource name BPX.EXECMVSAPF.program_name?
Can LONGPARM be applied to load modules as well as program objects?
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:10:14 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>OK, I'll byte (ah, bite). Can the DD be allocated to a UNIX file? I don't
>see why not, but then ... .
>
>//parmdd DD PATH='/home/myid/my-parm-file.txt',
>// FILEDATA=TEXT,
>// RECFM=VB,LRECL=32756,BLKSIZE=32760
>// PATHOPTS=(ORDONLY)
>
(or e
ARC1139I ERROR PROCESSING RACF PROTECTED DATA SET, RECOVERY/RECALL/DELETE
TERMINATED
Explanation: During a recall, recovery, restore, or delete opera
yes..it has "operations"I am a racf admin...I don't think the dsn profile
is what ailing this
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IB
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:11:54 +, Leonardo Vaz wrote:
>
>I am trying to run an authorized program from a rexx. More specifically, I am
>trying to run HZSPRNT from a rexx sitting on a cgi-bin from an IBM HTTP server.
>
>As expected, any tries to directly call the program results in an abend S047.
But does dfhsm?
Hi Allenunfortunately thats not it...I have Alter to that dsn profile
in racf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
Hi Allenunfortunately thats not it...I have Alter to that dsn profile
in racf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hello all,
I am trying to run an authorized program from a rexx. More specifically, I am
trying to run HZSPRNT from a rexx sitting on a cgi-bin from an IBM HTTP server.
As expected, any tries to directly call the program results in an abend S047. I
realize that the program needs to be run in a
On 4/5/2013 3:55 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
It must be Friday, so here is something meaty for you:
"My doctor warned me that I should WATCH what I'm eating, so I bought tickets to
July".
July - horse racing venue for betting purposes...
That may seem funny now, but during and after World
I believe this is due to a missing RACF discrete profile for the dataset.
Perform the RACF activities to give DFHSM (and/or) your userid access to the
dataset in question and retry.
HTH,
Yesterday I ran HSEND AUDIT DSCTL(BACKUP) NOFIX which reported a number of
errors, including quite a few E
Hi,
Yesterday I ran HSEND AUDIT DSCTL(BACKUP) NOFIX
which reported a number of errors, including quite a few ERR 39's
For example, I see repeated ERR 39's for a gdg that doesn't appear in ispf
3.4
(only the base...so its likely been gone for a long time)
ERR 39 DBP.LP.F.IN6PD003.TISECPV.P06.WEK.G0
It is working fine for me. Replied directly to you as well in hopes that
you see it.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:07 AM, william janulin wrote:
> is this list still working, I have not seen any messages since March 29th
>
> --
> Fo
OK, I'll byte (ah, bite). Can the DD be allocated to a UNIX file? I don't
see why not, but then ... .
//parmdd DD PATH='/home/myid/my-parm-file.txt',
// FILEDATA=TEXT,
// RECFM=VB,LRECL=32756,BLKSIZE=32760
// PATHOPTS=(ORDONLY)
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> >>With this
is this list still working, I have not seen any messages since March 29th
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>With this change, when the JCL interpreter sees the PARMDD=, it
>>allocates the buffer of 32768 bytes
>
>Did you see that documented somewhere?
As one should expect, how the system chooses to allocate storage it uses
is not documented, as there is no need for the user to care.
Informally, for
test
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 07:40:08 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>"A lot less cycles" here replaces a derisory number of them by an
>exiguous one. Jantje's example could be further "refined", but to
>what end?
>
Granted: in the overall total of cycles needed to build up the client
connection, validate t
Hi William,
I cannot help with the exact nature of the issue your people face but I can
confirm that DALLAS9 is in SYSIBM.LOCATIONs as proved by
SELECT * FROM SYSIBM.LOCATIONS
WHERE SUBSTR(LOCATION,1,6) = 'DALLAS'
A similar query against SYSIBM.SYSTABLES, SYSIBM.SYST
John Dawes wrote:
>I posted a question sometime back but I haven't seen it in the Inboox.
Uhm, what is "Inboox"? ;-D
Your message about ABARS example was safely delivered to IBM-MAIN and no
electrons were harmed or molested all the way to IBM-MAIN... ;-D
>Is IBM Main down?
Why are you asking?
AbsKerneels wrote:
>Just show us your JCL
And also any error messages.
>And we can then fix it for you as in do re me fa so la te do :
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxAvhsIjA_s
Hehe. ;-D
It must be Friday, so here is something meaty for you:
"My doctor warned me that I should WATCH what I'
41 matches
Mail list logo
