In ECOBOL v4.2 WARNING messages were always at the bottom of the SYSPRINT
output. In v5.1 the messages come before the assembler listing which makes
finding them a bit longer. Anyone else notice / have a concern about this ?
The messages are displayed in the SYSTERM but its so much easier to
Let's begin with queue-handling 101. A queue is a FIFO list. One
adds elements to the rear of a queue and removes them from the front.
Tony Harminc's implicit point, that these two operations can be
serialized and done unproblematically, is correct beyond argument.
There is never a requirement
I use cell pools. I also use a proprietary storage manager that doesn't use
chains. These methodology offer me capabilities well beyond those found in
traditional methods. Much of what I do is based on these capabilities, but
the algorithms could easily be adapted to use a conventional storage
In 8420266817299524.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/11/2013
at 09:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Doesn't JES3 already provide a similar facility?
No. DJC doesn't run parallel steps within a job, it handles
dependencies among a network of separate jobs.
--
In 5756776272434376.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/11/2013
at 10:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Yet, I appeal to consistency. If some designer pranced into the
room and announced, There's never any reason to skip the first
step, so I'm designing IF so the
In 6418058376534651.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/11/2013
at 10:31 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
SYSOUT=8 is likewise shorter and more readable, and I needn't
stretch to press the SHIFT key. Neither means the same as
SYSOUT=(,), which uses the default class.
In
CAAJSdjhH6D+uOVEtmxx4rOL=w2csasxtn8saahkj68g5wpg...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/11/2013
at 12:16 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com said:
I always got the feeling that orignal OS/360 JCL programmers
either stole the parsing code from the then-existant assembler,
or vice versa.
If so,
Hello List!
Does anyone know an easy way to query the processor weight for an LPAR?
HWIQUERY would do the trick but it seems overcomplicated to have to use BCPii.
Even the great Zelden doesn't have it in his IPLINFO rexx, so I would guess it
is not that trivial.
Thanks!
Leo
You could intercept/post-process the SMF type 70 records.
There used to be two unsupported/undocumented methods to get LPAR information -
one was to use the Diagnose 204 instruction and the other was to sniff
certain storage owned by RMF Monitor III.
I believe the latest version of SHOWZOS has
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:05:24 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
SYSOUT=8 is likewise shorter, more readable, and doesn't require
leaning on the SHIFT key.
SYSOUT=8 specifies SYSOUT class 8.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Hello Rob! Thank you very much for the information! Much appreciated,
especially from someone with great knowledge like you.
Thanks!
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob Scott
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013
In 1384218943.19861.yahoomail...@web181001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com, on
11/11/2013
at 05:15 PM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net said:
Take for example:
L R2,QUEUE
L R3,NEXT_ENTRY
CS R2,R3,QUEUE New queue head
I'm not sure what you're trying to do. Did you
In 7581281299781533.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/11/2013
at 08:21 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I suspect that it's something DFSMS jams into some control block
(TIOT?) where those utilities expect to find DSNAME when DFSMS
has allocated a PATH instead.
The
In 1285038259930504.wa.jmcd520gmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
11/11/2013
at 08:41 PM, John McDowell jmcd...@gmail.com said:
However neither of your points can overcome the fact that ISPF,
most (all?) TSO commands, IBM utilities (e.g. IEBUPDTE, etc.),
etc. impose the (arguably artificial and
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:32:42 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
SYSOUT=8 is likewise shorter and more readable, and I needn't
stretch to press the SHIFT key. Neither means the same as
SYSOUT=(,), which uses the default class.
The default class or the msgclass?
I said default, which might
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:38:31 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:05:24 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
SYSOUT=8 is likewise shorter, more readable, and doesn't require
leaning on the SHIFT key.
SYSOUT=8 specifies SYSOUT class 8.
Water is wet.
-- gil
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:14:19 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Doesn't JES3 already provide a similar facility?
No. DJC doesn't run parallel steps within a job, it handles
dependencies among a network of separate jobs.
But can those jobs run in parallel? If so, the desire for
parallelism
Robert Wessel robertwess...@yahoo.com writes:
That's not a very valid comparison. SDLC is mostly a link level
protocol; IP, UDP and TCP are not. In many cases there is
considerable error recovery on links that IP is run over - if for no
other reason than the end-to-end error recovery in TCP
l...@garlic.com (Anne Lynn Wheeler) writes:
a big issue with tcp throughput is slow-start as mechanism for
congestion control/avoidance ... aka in enormously large heterogeneous
network with dozens of hops end-to-end and bursty traffic ... there is
relatively high probability of periodic
Link-editing with AC=1 isn't enough. The module must also reside in an
APF-authorized library; otherwise the AC=1 is ignored.
However, his module could just be an 'innocent' changed version of an
existing production one which he is now checking (or debugging) before
it goes into prodution. So
After a long weekend with NO system changes(that I know of) when I issue
D T, nothing else appears on the console.
Any thoughts please.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
1651 Alhambra Blvd
Suite 200
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 11:36 -0800, John Norgauer wrote:
After a long weekend with NO system changes(that I know of) when I issue
D T, nothing else appears on the console.
Any thoughts please.
Console not in roll mode? WTO buffers full?
John Norgauer of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 11/12/2013 01:36:50 PM:
From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/12/2013 01:37 PM
Subject: D T command gives no result.
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
John Norgauer wrote:
After a long weekend with NO system changes(that I know of) when I issue
D T, nothing else appears on the console.
Any thoughts please.
snip
Does it show up in SYSLOG/OPERLOG?
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
On 11/12/2013 2:20 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
There will always be 'risks' with APF'd libraries in the wrong hands.
It's up to the security administrator to grant MVS SETPROG authority
only to trusted developers.
SETPROG seems like overkill. Many moons ago I modified a CBT
contribution from Don
Display of MPF
MESSAGE ID -MPF SUPPRESS RETAIN AUTO TOKEN EXIT ,
.NO_ENTRY -00 NO YESYES ,
GENERAL WTO USER EXIT (IEAVMXIT) ACTIVE ,
SUBSYSTEMS RECEIVING FOREIGN MESSAGES AND DOMS: ,
*ALL ,
FIELD-MPF COLOR HLIGHT INTENFIELD-MPF COLOR HLIGHT INTEN ,
//UNP EXEC PGM=AMATERSE,PARM=UNPACK
[...]
** AMA572I STARTING TERSE DECODE UNPACK 20:08:51 11/07/2013
** AMA527I INPUT - DDNAME : SYSUT1 DSNAME: ...PATH=.SPECIFIED...
** AMA583E INPUT DEVICE TYPE IS UNSUPPORTED
** AMA573I TERSE COMPLETE DECODE UNPACK 20:08:51
I'm writing an article for SHARE blog --
http://www.share.org/p/bl/et/blogid=2 -- on Redbooks, Redpapers,
Redguides, residencies (shouldn't they be Redidencies or some such?),
workshops, and the ITSO (International Technical Support Organization)
structure behind them.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:31:24 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
TRSMAIN was an IBM internal tool which was written before
the advent of PATH= in MVS. When TRSMAIN morphed into
AMATERSE, there was no intention of adding PATH= support.
AMATERSE does a DEVTYPE, and checks DVACLASS (in IHADVA mapping).
If it
The listserv bounced the first version of this as a duplicate. Do they
have a bug?
On 11/12/2013 2:20 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
There will always be 'risks' with APF'd libraries in the wrong hands.
It's up to the security administrator to grant MVS SETPROG authority
only to trusted developers.
Thanks Kenneth for the explanation. It's really good stuff. All the
serialization that I've seen was prior to the PLO instruction. I now see that
it has certainly improved our ability to serialize.
Jon Perryman.
From: Kenneth Wilkerson redb...@austin.rr.com
The example was simply to show a point without using an involved sample. At a
minimum, I should have included a USING for the queue entry. Sorry for the
confusion.
Jon Perryman.
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
In
On 12 November 2013 18:31, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
It's curious looked at as a whole. The very existence of an AMA527I
suggests that PATH= is supported; it's an I message (nothing wrong),
and there must be code to discover that PATH= was specified.
[...]
TRSMAIN was an IBM internal
Thanks for sharing your design Ken. It seems to me that PLO is best used
for data structures like double-ended queues where elements can be
inserted/removed from both ends of the queue atomically. In the case of
a read-often-write-rarely list with multiple readers that traverse the
list it
Actually, the algorithm performs well for read-often, write-rarely list
because the active chain count does not change and therefore there are
relatively infrequent re-drives. The active chain count only changes on an
add or delete. So if there are infrequent adds and deletes, there will be
I received the first version of this OK. Thanks for the info: I have
nothing more to add to it. Chris Poncelet
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
The listserv bounced the first version of this as a duplicate. Do they
have a bug?
On 11/12/2013 2:20 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
There will always be
On 13/11/2013 12:34 PM, Kenneth Wilkerson wrote:
Actually, the algorithm performs well for read-often, write-rarely list
because the active chain count does not change and therefore there are
relatively infrequent re-drives. The active chain count only changes on an
add or delete. So if there
Does anyone who uses the Marist Academic Initiative system connect to DB2 using
php? If so, what is the connection syntax you use?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 21:34
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: D T command gives no result.
John Norgauer wrote:
After a long weekend with NO system
39 matches
Mail list logo
