The answer is still yes.
First create a Load profile for each LPAR for each IPL mode, such as
production, SAD, or whatever. Give each Profile a meaningful name and set
the load address and loadparm in each profile for that IPL mode. Do the
same for alternate sysres packs.
Create a group cal
Charles:
JCLCHECK is like the Yugo of JCL tools. It is a very basic syntax checker.
JOL is likely an OK tool, but does not contain the feature-rich capabilities of
other products on the market.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Thu, Nov 14, 2013 5:51
J R:
Yes, it goes far beyond z/OS. It can clone JCL for multiple environments, it
can generate JCL from COBOL source programs as the source objects are built, it
can verify that the DD statements in a JCL stream match the FDs in a COBOL
program, it can ensure that if you don't allow DCB in a D
I think Mitch and JR are speaking about some JCL front-end commercial
product such as CA JCLCheck.
I was looking for a response about JOL from its author.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of J R
Sent: Thursday, Nov
Dated(very) Hearsay.
<>
>To SUBSCRIBE to IBM-MAIN, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
>following in the body: SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN
>
>- - - - -
>
>To SIGNOFF from IBM-MAIN, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
>following in the body: SIGNOFF IBM-MAIN
>
Last I heard that was the email address was there but no INFO document
to return.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:14 PM, efinnell15 wrote:
>>>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ^
>
> In a message dated 11/14/13
In
,
on 11/14/2013
at 03:26 PM, Tony Harminc said:
>If you don't want to patent, but also don't want others to patent
>your invention, you can publish in a place that gets reasonable
>exposure,
The point of a defensive patent is to avoid expensive litigation, not
to win it. Unless the USPTO s
For non-SHARE-ers might find educational.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAINHow can a strong mentoring strategy best help you
On 14 November 2013 09:26, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
wrote:
>at 08:40 PM, David Crayford said:
>
>>Or patents! I notice IBM have quite a few wrt PLO.
>
> Could they be defensive patents? The only really effective way to
> prevent someone else from patenting a technique that you're using is
> t
I know that we can create separate Groups, but what we really want to do is to
create separate instances of the existing images in the existing "CPC Images"
group. The new instances would use the stand alone dump load profile. Can we do
that and, if so, how?
---
Hi, JoAnn!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
So, as far as what ends up being submitted to z/OS is concerned, your
competitive product does not provide any functionality that isn't already
available with z/OS JCL?
=
=
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:08:36 -0500
> From: mitc...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Jol - Next Generation JCL- was JCL - Wh
>>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
^
In a message dated 11/14/13 12:00:48 Central Standard Time, trs...@att.net
writes:
SET IBM-Main NOMAIL
---
SET IBM-Main NOMAIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks everyone, as usual, for your timely and enlightening responses (Skip,
your advice is always at the very least, germane!).
Tom Sims
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
Charles (et al):
In regards to the competitive product I have been alluding to, it DOES generate
"traditional" (real) z/OS JCL.
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
www.lcmg.us
-Original Message-
From: Charles Mills
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Thu, Nov 14, 2013 8:22 am
Subject: Re
I'm curious -- and if someone wants to reply RTFM I guess it would be deserved
-- how the product "integrates" with core/"traditional"/IBM-authored z/OS.
Does it generate "real" JCL under the covers, or does it have its own started
task that acts in a role parallel to the appropriate "normal" z/
In <5284c4bc.5000...@gmail.com>, on 11/14/2013
at 08:40 PM, David Crayford said:
>Or patents! I notice IBM have quite a few wrt PLO.
Could they be defensive patents? The only really effective way to
prevent someone else from patenting a technique that you're using is
to file first. Unless and
That terminology morass is the reason for my declaration of terms. When we
started mirroring for DR, we ran ESCON over traditional channel extenders.
We did not think we could tolerate the effects synchronous delays in PPRC.
Now we run FICON over DWDM in a configuration that might be suitable fo
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130723/09543223903/joel-spolsky-stackexchange-thwarts-broad-microsoft-patent-app-using-microsofts-own-prior-art.shtml
Submit Prior Art to U.S. Patent office Appilications
http://patents.stackexchange.com/
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Kenneth Wilkerson
wrote
And you can hear Chris and the IDMS team speak about this:
CA IDMS gets even zIIP-ier.
Want more CPU without buying more MIPS? Join the CA IDMS team and customers
Chris Hoelscher and Iain Robertson for a live webcast and quick tour of the new
CA IDMS zIIP expansion in 18.0 and 18.5.
Tuesd
BBC News - Meet the robot that teaches coding
Pretty spiffy.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Clem:
Good morning. So, how many customers use this product? Does it interface with
the various change management tools? What about keyword and subparameter
substitution for various site/environment requirements? What about
format/structure changes so that the JCL is consistent across all m
I'm with you on patents. I came across an IBM patent yesterday that was
dated 2009 describing a lock-free storage manager using cell pools to
manage variable length storage. I invented my first one 30 years ago using
CAS. It was writing a more sophisticated version 10 years ago that led to my
res
On 14/11/2013 12:23 AM, Kenneth Wilkerson wrote:
If I read the article you sent correctly, this algorithm is using a spin
lock. It has provision for implementing a lock-free algorithm but none of
those are detailed.
Most of the shared_ptr implementations in the wild, including z/OS, use
a lock
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Case resolved.
>A colleague in the z/OS TCP/IP Team asked me to post on his behalf.
He tried another port to see and it that server worked.
My RACF add-on tool showed me it was another TCP/IP stack on that sandbox which
was holding that port. (despite the fact you c
26 matches
Mail list logo
