Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Binyamin Dissen wrote: >I want to add CURRENT to SUM, but most of the time CURRENT will be zero. >CURRENT and SUM are not adjacent (different data lines) >Which is best After seeing all the good replies, I'm wondering about one thing. Is your loading, adding and storing statements in a loop or

Re: Query group capacity settings

2014-02-16 Thread Duffy Nightingale, SS
I'd be interested in that too. Duffy Nightingale Sound Software Printing, Inc. du...@soundsoftware.us www.soundsoftware.us Phone: 360.385.3456 Fax: 973.201.8921 The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the

Re: Query group capacity settings

2014-02-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/13/2014 7:19 AM, zman wrote: Is there any way (macro function or control block) to get the Capacity Group the Lpar is belonging to and the Capacity limit for that group? SYSEVENT REQLPDAT -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 h

Re: SYSLOG messages Frozen

2014-02-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/12/2014 3:30 AM, mf db wrote: IEE026I SYSLOG NOT SUPPORTED - After V SYSLOG,HARDCPY Hopefully, you can get IBM to open a DOC APAR given that 'SYSLOG' is not a documented value for this message. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo,

Interesting? Mobile App (iOS & Android) for IBM Redbooks

2014-02-16 Thread John McKown
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/mobileapp?Open -- Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing? Maranatha! <>< John McKown -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe /

Re: RACF AIM Stage 3 Issue

2014-02-16 Thread Lizette Koehler
Venkat, Since you are posting this to both the RACF and IBMMAIN List, it would be better to continue this on RACF. They will probably be more helpful. Remember, we cannot logon to your shop, you need to show us all the details. List the DEV1 user and all elements. List the BPX.UNIQUE.USER and

Re: RACF AIM Stage 3 Issue

2014-02-16 Thread venkat kulkarni
Hello, After following all steps required to setup BPX.UNIQUE.USER, I asked my customer to run his Job and he again encountered OMVS segment issue as below. N 410 DEVL14045 11:38:12.51 STC01541 0090 MIN0002I net service DEV1 initialized. Version:1.2.1.7 M 008 DEVL

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/16/2014 1:10 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: Say I have two words, CURRENT DS F SUM DS F I want to add CURRENT to SUM, but most of the time CURRENT will be zero. CURRENT and SUM are not adjacent (different data lines) If only a single unit of work and

Re: RACF AIM Stage 3 Issue

2014-02-16 Thread Gibney, Dave
Please provide exact error messages now that you are stage 3. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:25 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: RACF AIM Stage

Re: RACF AIM Stage 3 Issue

2014-02-16 Thread venkat kulkarni
Hello Group, any more clue to solve this issue. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:32 AM, venkat kulkarni wrote: > > > > > Yes, UNLOADED IRRUT400 worked for me and now RACF is at AIM stage 3. >> As I mentioned earlier, we have we have z/OS 1.13 and z/OS 2.1 system in >> syspl

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 07:40:39 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >I am by no means an expert but based on my mental model, the branch approach >is going to be slower. > It depends on the likelihood of an expensive cache fault performing an operation which has no effect. >-Original Message- >From

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Charles Mills
I am by no means an expert but based on my mental model, the branch approach is going to be slower. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 1:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.U

Re: Storage Obtain .....

2014-02-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <7320538829520852.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on 02/12/2014 at 07:11 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >The "subpool thing" oughtn't be checked unless one or more bytes are >to be freed. There is no nonzero length associated with a subpool FREEMAIN. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,

Re: Storage Obtain .....

2014-02-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 02/13/2014 at 08:35 AM, John Gilmore said: >My personal view is that the original design decision was not a bad >but a good one. I understand Jim Mulder's view. Caricatured only a >little, it is that the incompetent must be protected from the >consequences of their follies. Not even

Re: Storage Obtain .....

2014-02-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <0a5001cf2857$e991b560$bcb52020$@mcn.org>, on 02/12/2014 at 05:07 PM, Charles Mills said: >And then the OP would have cleared that "dummy" storage area passed >back from OBTAIN and wondered how _that_ happened. If someone does a zero length GETMAIN and then tries to clear the storage poin

Re: Was: Implicit VVDS creation now: FDR & VVDS's

2014-02-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <02b6c5b8-a688-4da3-ae65-a9ab8a56b...@comcast.net>, on 02/12/2014 at 09:19 AM, Ed Gould said: >FDR,compaktor I'm pretty sure that it treats the VVDS the same as any other data set. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Steve Comstock
On 2/16/2014 2:10 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: Say I have two words, CURRENT DS F SUM DS F I want to add CURRENT to SUM, but most of the time CURRENT will be zero. CURRENT and SUM are not adjacent (different data lines) Which is best L

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Gene Hudders
You should worry more about the CLC that has two references to storage In a message dated 2/16/2014 8:58:08 A.M. Atlantic Standard Time, allan.stal...@kbmg.com writes: Without testing, I believe ICM will be much slower than LOAD HTH or ICM Rx,B'',CURRENT JZ SKIP A Rx,SU

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Staller, Allan
Without testing, I believe ICM will be much slower than LOAD HTH or ICM Rx,B'',CURRENT JZ SKIP A Rx,SUM STRx,SUM SKIPDS0H In a message dated 2/16/2014 8:51:07 A.M. Atlantic Standard Time, mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wri

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Gene Hudders
or ICM Rx,B'',CURRENT JZ SKIP A Rx,SUM STRx,SUM SKIPDS0H In a message dated 2/16/2014 8:51:07 A.M. Atlantic Standard Time, mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes: Would this be even faster? CLC CURRENT,=F'0' JZ SKIP

Re: Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Mike Schwab
Would this be even faster? CLC CURRENT,=F'0' JZSKIP L Rx,CURRENT A Rx,SUM STRx,SUM SKIPDS0H On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > Say I have two w

Performance question - adding

2014-02-16 Thread Binyamin Dissen
Say I have two words, CURRENT DS F SUM DS F I want to add CURRENT to SUM, but most of the time CURRENT will be zero. CURRENT and SUM are not adjacent (different data lines) Which is best L Rx,CURRENT A Rx,SUM